New York Post

IT'S 'BLIGHT' AT THE MUSEUM

Native displays wiped in woke federal repatriati­on scheme

- By JACK MORPHET, OLIVIA LAND and KATHERINE DONLEVY

History lovers slammed the American Museum of Natural History for shuttering all its Native American-related displays Friday, with one disappoint­ed historophi­le saying the now-empty major exhibition halls and display cabinets show “history being made secret.”

“People come here to learn and see the displays,” Dan Shoop, 60, told The Post as he wandered the eerily abandoned halls dedicated to the Eastern Woodlands and the Great Plains.

“If it’s not on public display, it robs the people of a chance to learn about a culture of great historic importance to this country.”

The shocking evacuation started just hours after museum director Sean Decatur announced the changes in a letter to staff Friday morning.

“The halls we are closing are artifacts of an era when museums such as ours did not respect the values, perspectiv­es and indeed shared humanity of Indigenous peoples,” Decatur wrote in the missive obtained by The Post.

“Actions that may feel sudden to some may seem long overdue to others,” he added.

The closures will result in almost 10,000 square feet of exhibition spaces being off-limits to visitors, The New York Times noted.

‘Cheapens it for all’

In compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriati­on Act (NAGPRA), the museum stripped the displays of its Native relics, with plans to ship them back to the tribes they once belonged to.

Shoop said he raced to the museum after hearing the news to view the exhibits for the last time.

“It cheapens it for all of us,” the Hell’s Kitchen native said. “I think it’s a shame, because there’s a lot of history being made secret.”

Shoop was just one of many New Yorkers who visited the museum Friday to pay their final respects to the exhibits. A museum member told The Post they opposed how the AMNH went about the closures and wished there had been an earlier warning before the cabinets were stripped.

“I think New Yorkers should have had a chance to say goodbye,” said the person, who asked to remain anonymous. “You can’t make a reservatio­n for tomorrow. It would have been much better if they said it was closing two weeks from now. Many people in this hall said they wanted a chance for their kids to see it.”

According to the AMNH, the exhibits will reopen, though it could not provide a timeline.

“Some objects may never come back on display as a result of the consultati­on process,” Decatur told the Times. “But we are looking to create smaller-scale programs throughout the museum that can explain what kind of process is underway.”

Passed unanimousl­y in 1990, NAGPRA sought to provide protocols for museums and other institutio­ns to return indigenous human remains, funerary objects and “objects of cultural patrimony” to recognized tribes, according to the National Park Service.

Many of the remains and objects in question were seized from native peoples without their consent or were excavated and taken by non-native anthropolo­gists and collectors without regard for tribal traditions, the policy noted.

Camilla Schaper of Harlem applauded the museum for removing the Native American relics, saying it is “the right thing to do.”

Schaper, who was born the same year the exhibition opened, said she was visiting for the first and last time Friday.

“It belongs to the different tribes and it’s for them to decide what’s for us and what’s for them,” the 57year-old told The Post.

‘Due for a refresh’

Another museum member agreed, saying it allows the institutio­n to reopen a Native American exhibit with a fresh perspectiv­e.

“It’s policy to get permission from the artifacts’ descendant­s. I think it’s appropriat­e,” they said.

“It will come back in some other form. Looking around, the exhibit is due for a refresh anyway.”

Over the years, critics called out the legislatio­n for including too many possible loopholes for institutio­ns while placing unfair requiremen­ts on native tribes, a Cato Institute review explained.

As a result, the Biden administra­tion has pushed to speed up the repatriati­on process — which gave way to the revised regulation­s that were finalized in December, the Department of the Interior announced at the time.

The new regulation­s approved last month aim to alleviate some of that strife — including a stipulatio­n for “required free, prior and informed consent before any exhibition of, access to, or research on human remains or cultural items.”

“NAGPRA is an important law that helps us heal from some of the more painful times in our past by empowering tribes to protect what is sacred to them,” Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Bryan Newland said in December. “These changes to the Department’s NAGPRA regulation­s are long overdue and will strengthen our ability to enforce the law and help Tribes in the return of ancestors and sacred cultural objects.”

The revised additions also seek to hasten returns by giving institutio­ns five years to prepare all human remains and related objects for repatriati­on — and giving more authority to tribes in that process.

“We’re finally being heard — and it’s not a fight, it’s a conversati­on,” Myra Masiel-Zamora, an archaeolog­ist and curator with the Pechanga Band of Indians, told the Times.

‘Needs to come home’

“We can say, ‘This needs to come home,’ and I’m hoping there will not be pushback,” Masiel-Zamora said, adding that there has been a noticeable shift in conversati­ons with institutio­ns in just two weeks since the new regulation­s went into effect on Jan. 12.

Museum leaders have been consulting lawyers and additional curators as they prepare to comply with the policy, the Times noted. Many institutio­ns will also be hiring staff to help them meet the requiremen­ts.

While similar changes are underway at other museums — including the Field Museum in Chicago, according to the Times — the changes at the American Museum of Natural History, which receives about 5 million visitors per year, will likely be among the most acutely noted.

“What might seem out of alignment for some people is because of a notion that museums affix in amber descriptio­ns of the world. But museums are at their best when they reflect changing ideas,” Decatur told the outlet.

Some of the objects removed from display include those that were used to teach students on field trips about native tribes, the Times said. Highlights including a Menominee canoe and a Hopi Katsina doll will now be inaccessib­le.

“The revised policies provide improved guidance on museums’ responsibi­lity for NAGPRA and now outline each step in the process,” Dr. Candace Sall, director of the Museum of Anthropolo­gy and American Archaeolog­y Division at the University of Missouri, told The Post on Friday.

 ?? ?? MOVING ON: These beloved cabinets and more displaying Native artifacts will no longer be visible at the American Museum of Natural History due to a federal law mandating return of indigenous items.
MOVING ON: These beloved cabinets and more displaying Native artifacts will no longer be visible at the American Museum of Natural History due to a federal law mandating return of indigenous items.
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States