New York Post

I MEG YOUR PARDON?

Sussex fume: It’d be bedlam if we fixed pix

- By SARA NATHAN

Sources close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry waded into Kate Middleton’s bizarre photoediti­ng crisis Monday, saying: “This isn’t a mistake Meghan would ever make.”

Unlike the Princess of Wales, the exiled British royals would “have been annihilate­d” if they had handed out secretly Photoshopp­ed images of themselves and their family, sources told Page Six.

The claim comes after Kate released a photo of herself and her three children for British Mother’s Day, more than two months since she vanished from public view to deal with a mysterious health condition — only for the photo to turn out to have been heavily edited.

The world’s leading photograph­ic news agencies, including Reuters and The Associated Press, warned against its use, telling clients, including newspapers and television outlets around the world, to “kill” the photo.

Digitally doctored

The image file’s metadata showed it had been hastily edited on Friday and Saturday before its release. There was even speculatio­n Kate had reused a 2016 Vogue cover to create a Frankenste­in image.

On Monday, the princess issued an apology for any “confusion” sparked by the image, saying: “I do occasional­ly experiment with editing.” Prince William had taken the photo.

In California, sources close to her brother-in-law Prince Harry and his wife told Page Six, “If Harry and Meghan had ever encountere­d the same issue they would have been annihilate­d.

“The same rules do not apply to both couples.

“This isn’t a mistake that Meghan would ever make . . . she has a keen eye and freakish attention to detail.”

There were at least 10 failures in the photo, with only the image of Prince George, 10, apparently unaltered.

Among the mistakes were Princess Charlotte, 8, having had part of her wrist apparently removed, Princess Kate’s own hand missing a wedding ring and Prince Louis, 5, with strangely crossed fingers.

Royal sources told Page Six that this was “an amateur, family photograph taken by the Prince of Wales.”

They said the couple wanted to offer an “informal” picture of the family together for Mother’s Day, which is marked earlier in the UK than the US, and that Kate made only “minor adjustment­s.”

A Kensington Palace source added, “The Wales family spent Mother’s Day together and had a wonderful day.”

Despite calls for the original to be published, Kensington Palace said it would not be reissuing the unedited photograph of Kate and her children.

The bizarre photo-bomb threw

lighter fuel on the intense speculatio­n around Kate’s long-running disappeara­nce from public life.

Kate, 42, has been out of the public eye since having major abdominal surgery in January, with Kensington Palace warning that she would not be back to royal duties until at least until Easter.

The lack of informatio­n about the surgery and its cause intensifie­d last month when William, 41, sparked fears that something was drasticall­y wrong by pulling out of a memorial for his godfather, King Constantin­e of Greece, just 45 minutes before the event, citing “personal reasons.”

‘Missing’ monarch

This prompted social media to go into hyperdrive about the “missing” princess, forcing the palace to say that she was recovering well. Days later, photos showed Kate being driven near her home in Windsor by her mother, Carole Middleton.

The photograph­s were not widely published by UK media to avoid upsetting the royals.

But on Monday, Kate surfaced in public view for the first time since Christmas, being photograph­ed in the back of a car with William.

William was going to London for a key royal event, the Commonweal­th Service at Westminste­r Abbey — where he was seen laughing with his stepmother, Queen Camilla — while Kate had a “private appointmen­t,” Page Six was told.

Originally, Kate was said to be planning to return to royal duties at Easter, but with that date rapidly approachin­g no comeback has been scheduled and Britain’s defense ministry had to backtrack when it announced she would be at a high-profile event in June.

The interventi­on of sources close to Kate’s bitterly estranged brother-in-law and his wife is unlikely to be felt positively at Kensington Palace.

One royal source told Page Six that Markle is “control freak” about imagery, adding, “She always wants the final say, especially when it came to her editing of Vogue.”

Markle “guest-edited” the British edition of Vogue in 2019 but was said to have left staff exasperate­d, while her theme of 15 women she was inspired by stirred controvers­y when it did not include Queen Elizabeth.

We’re also told that Markle, 42, never wanted to follow palace procedure of releasing images via photo agencies such as AP and Reuters, and only ever wanted to post them on the @sussexroya­l Instagram account, which she controlled, retaining copyrights.

Still, the Sussexes had their own photo issue with their 2019 holiday card which featured a picture of baby Prince Archie that social-media sleuths claimed was manipulate­d.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? ROYAL TREATMENT: Sources close to Megan and Harry huff that they’d be “annihilate­d” in the press if they’d released an edited photo like the one causing a stir for Kate Middleton (opposite page, and above on Monday with Prince William outside Windsor Castle).
ROYAL TREATMENT: Sources close to Megan and Harry huff that they’d be “annihilate­d” in the press if they’d released an edited photo like the one causing a stir for Kate Middleton (opposite page, and above on Monday with Prince William outside Windsor Castle).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States