New York Post

Shame on smug libs’ ‘missing’ Middleton mockery

- KIRSTEN FLEMING

HEARING Kate Middleton’s shocking cancer announceme­nt on Friday, my heart went out to her. Then I thought of Stephen Colbert, who comported himself in a gruesome way — breathing viral life into an old rumor about Prince William having an affair with a family friend.

“The kingdom has been all aflutter by the seeming disappeara­nce of Kate Middleton. Well now, Internet sleuths are guessing that Kate’s absence may be related to her husband and the future King of England, William, having an affair,” he said, mockingly, during a “Late Show” monologue on March 12.

“So, I think we all know who the alleged other woman is. Say it with me — the Marchiones­s of Cholmondel­ey — what a beautiful name!”

I expect he felt like an inch of a human after learning the truth.

But then again, shame is in such short supply these days.

Colbert, who lost his funny bone serving in the Trump resistance army and who has shilled for COVID vaccines, will not be able to inoculate himself from much-deserved scorn.

Tasteless pile-on

But he was hardly the only public figure having fun with the Princess of Wales’ “disappeara­nce,” despite Kensington Palace announcing in January that she’d had abdominal surgery and would be “unlikely to return to public duties until after Easter.”

Kim Kardashian jumped into the fray as online conspiracy theories abounded, posting on Instagram that she was “On my way to go find Kate.”

Andy Cohen first said that a video last weekend showing Middleton shopping was fake — “That ain’t Kate” — then doubled down by giving more credence to the affair rumors: calling William “his father’s” son, in reference to King Charles’ affair with Queen Camilla while married to Diana.

Yesterday, Markle mouthpiece Omid Scobie ghoulishly tweeted (and later deleted) an image of an alarm clock set for 6 p.m. — the UK time for Middleton’s announceme­nt. The gross cynicism. The royals are internatio­nal figures and certainly not off-limits when it comes to mockery. It’s an ugly reality that comes with the privilege of the crown. And yes, the palace fumbled initial messaging — or lack thereof — around Middleton’s health crisis in a comically naive way.

A chuckle over Middleton’s notorious Photoshop editing fail of her Mother’s Day picture was not beyond the pale.

But it was also clear that, behind the scenes, something was truly wrong — and yet so many continued to relentless­ly dig in, shoveling wild conspiraci­es for clicks and laughs.

Still, the Princess of Wales sat on that bench in her video and exhibited superhuman grace and restraint.

“I wanted to take this opportunit­y to say thank you, personally, for all the wonderful messages of support and for your understand­ing whilst I have been recovering from surgery,” she said.

The royal family has long held a public-relations motto of “Never complain, never explain.” She may have been forced by the cruel Kate-anon army to explain, yet she held tight to the “never complain” credo.

In the emotional video, which brought tears to my eyes, she reminded us that her priority was not the lunatic Internet sleuths, but her children.

“But, most importantl­y, it has taken us time to explain everything to George, Charlotte and Louis in a way that is appropriat­e for them, and to reassure them that I am going to be OK.”

Duty to country, yes, but that came second to duty to home.

Look no further than our disgusting confession­al culture, where celebritie­s — some in Middleton’s own family — are compensate­d for oversharin­g. Social media, filled with cringewort­hy revelation­s, has commodifie­d disease, disorders and drama.

Maybe that’s why no one could believe the princess wanted to stay quiet. Discretion, once valued, has become a foreign concept.

We have much to learn about strength from Middleton, who I hope has a swift recovery — and a bright future on the British throne.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States