New York Post

Detransiti­on Disney

It ignores those its activism hurt

- PAUL CHESSER Paul Chesser is director of the Corporate Integrity Project for National Legal and Policy Center.

DOES Disney care about more about the praise of transgende­r activists or the pain of its employees and their family, including children? The answer will become clear at the company’s April 3 annual meeting, when shareholde­rs vote on a proposal my organizati­on filed. We’re asking the company, which has famously associated itself with the gender-ideology movement, to stop ignoring the significan­t medical needs of those who’ve tried to reverse their sex transition­s.

My group, as a Disney shareholde­r, filed our proposal with the company in October. We want the entertainm­ent giant to explain why its health insurance doesn’t include coverage for people who attempt to detransiti­on. It’s a matter of equal treatment that especially matters as more Americans pursue sex changes they end up regretting, a trend Disney strengthen­ed by so publicly aligning itself with the transgende­r cause.

Many people who attempt a transition have gender dysphoria, a psychologi­cal condition that involves feeling uncomforta­ble with one’s biological sex. Rather than get the proper counseling they need to address it, they are generally fast-tracked by medical practition­ers into an invasive and often irreversib­le regimen of drugs and surgeries. Yet instead of having their bodily discomfort soothed, many find themselves dealing with horrible physical consequenc­es and worse mental-health issues.

My organizati­on has worked with Chloe Cole, who began a gender transition at age 12 and is the patient advocate at the nonprofit Do No Harm. By age 16, after taking puberty blockers and receiving a double mastectomy, she tried to turn back. Yet her body has been irreversib­ly changed and damaged, and years later, her chest is still bandaged. She will likely be on different medication­s and need ongoing treatments for the rest of her life.

Detransiti­oners tell similar stories, and while there’s no good estimate of how many there are, it’s certain the number is growing fast. But Disney’s health-insurance coverage ignores detransiti­oners altogether. Disney is happy to help employees and their family — including children — ruin their bodies. It has no interest in helping them fix the bodies, despite encouragin­g them down that ruinous path.

Disney is doing the bidding of a powerful outside interest group — the Human Rights Campaign. The group’s Corporate Equality Index ranks companies in part on their commitment to transgende­rism, and to earn a 100% score, their health-insurance coverage must include gender transition­s for employees, family members and dependents. Disney’s coverage with Cigna, for example, includes the reduction in size of testes, constructi­on of a penis or vagina and various other genitalia-building and -amputating procedures, as well as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

Human Rights Campaign denies there’s a need for restorativ­e care, reflecting the activist community’s belief that detransiti­oners are anomalous. Acknowledg­ing their existence — and increasing number — would draw attention to the fact gender transition­s are often irreversib­le, raising awkward questions about the morality of what they’re pushing. They’re happy to help a young girl cut off her breasts but less thrilled about helping her replace what she’s forever lost.

Disney scores 100% and has effectivel­y admitted it doesn’t cover the cost of detransiti­on treatments. Most notably, when Disney asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for permission to exclude our shareholde­r proposal for its annual meeting, it could have stated the proposal is moot because it already covers detransiti­ons. Instead, Disney tried to exclude it on technical grounds. The SEC forced the company to keep it.

Disney management has urged shareholde­rs to oppose our proposal. But that’s what you’d expect from a company that loudly touts its 100% score. Management fears losing the coveted designatio­n because negative media coverage will follow, as AnheuserBu­sch recently found out.

Disney isn’t alone. The Human Rights Campaign has bestowed 100% scores on 595 corporatio­ns. My organizati­on has filed similar proposals with several of them, including Johnson & Johnson and PepsiCo, which have upcoming shareholde­r meetings. At its December meeting, Microsoft management urged shareholde­rs to vote against our proposal, which failed to pass. The company gets to keep its 100% score — and keep ignoring the urgent and lifelong medical needs of a growing class of people.

Whatever happens at Disney, the fight to protect detransiti­oners will continue. The Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission has already made it illegal to discrimina­te in pay or benefits based on “gender identity” and “sexual orientatio­n.” As our proposal makes clear, that language includes detransiti­oners, even if companies like Disney and transgende­r activists don’t like it or deny their existence.

If Disney shareholde­rs don’t give these suffering people their due April 3, it’s only a matter of time before a new presidenti­al administra­tion or courts force them.

Detransiti­oners are people too, and it’s time Disney and every other company acknowledg­ed their pain instead of blindly seeking activist praise.

 ?? ?? Damage done: Chloe Cole, who reversed her gender transition, on Capitol Hill.
Damage done: Chloe Cole, who reversed her gender transition, on Capitol Hill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States