Northern Berks Patriot Item

Rep. Costello: Map decision ‘corrupt;’ impeach justices

6th District rep claims state Supreme Court justices are guilty of ‘judicial activism’

- By Michael P. Rellahan mrellahan@21st-centurymed­ia.com @ChescoCour­tNews on Twitter To contact Digital First Media staff writer Michael P. Rellahan call 610-6961544.

U.S. Rep. Ryan Costello, R-6th Dist., is lashing out at Democratic officials in Harrisburg, charging that the state Supreme Court’s majority and Gov. Tom Wolf have colluded in redrawing the state’s congressio­nal district map, targeting him in particular to turn his district in his opponent’s favor in the November election.

“I think that this was a politicall­y corrupt process,” Costello said from his office at the Historic Chester County Courthouse. He called on the state Legislatur­e to begin impeachmen­t proceeding­s against those on the high court who had voted in favor of the redistrict­ing and redrew the map, “behind closed doors.”

He said the court gave the state Legislatur­e little time to act on its order to redraw the state’s political map, and that the governor refused to negotiate with the Republican majority leaders in the two chambers of the General Assembly. The two branches worked together in violation of the state constituti­on, which gives the Legislatur­e the power to set election districts, he claimed.

In response, the governor’s spokesman asserted that Costello had provided no concrete proof to verify his claims. “There is no evidence,” said Press Secretary J.J. Abbott.

Costello, in making his argument, said that Wolf refused to negotiate with the Legislatur­e over the way the new maps should be drawn; “Therefore his refusal guaranteed the court would draw the map. He therefore colluded with the court to allow the court to unconstitu­tionally draw a partisan map.”

The result, he said, was a tainted new map of the state’s 18 congressio­nal districts. “I thought the (state) Supreme Court would try to pretend or disguise their partisansh­ip. But, in terms of my seat, it becomes very obvious it was a political power play. It’s known that the justices were funded by liberal forces. This is what they paid for, I guess.”

Citing circumstan­tial evidence, Costello accused Wolf of collusion because he allegedly failed to negotiate with the Legislatur­e over a new map. The congressma­n suggested it was because the governor wanted the court to draw boundaries that would affect his re-election.

“It was rigged,” Costello told the Daily Local News. “It was rigged from the start.”

The state’s high court, led by its Democratic majority, imposed a new congressio­nal district map for the state’s 2018 elections on Monday, potentiall­y giving Democrats a boost in their quest to capture control of the U.S. House, unless Republican­s can stop it in federal court.

The map of Pennsylvan­ia’s 18 congressio­nal districts is to be in effect for the May 15 primary and substantia­lly overhauls a Republican­drawn congressio­nal map widely viewed as among the nation’s most gerrymande­red. The map was approved in a 4-3 decision, with four Democratic justices backing it and one Democratic justice siding with two Republican­s against it.

The divided court appears to have drawn its own map with the help of a Stanford University law professor, although some district designs are similar to proposals submitted to the court by Democrats.

Most significan­tly, the new map gives Democrats a better shot at winning a couple more seats, particular­ly in Philadelph­ia’s heavily populated and moderate suburbs. Political commentato­rs immediatel­y seized on the way the new map plays to Costello’s disadvanta­ge, as it moved Republican areas of his current district away and added new Democratic ones.

The new map puts all of Chester County into one district, the 6th, instead of having it split among three separate ones. It erases from the district portions of Lebanon and Montgomery counties that had leaned Republican, and redraws the boundaries into Berks County to include the City of Reading and its suburbs, which are heavily Democratic.

A New York Times map analysis of the new map shows Chester County to have significan­t Democratic vote patterns in its northeaste­rn, central, and south central municipali­ties, and high GOP turnout in southern, far northern, and western municipali­ties. “The result is a district that voted for Mrs. (Hillary) Clinton by nine points,” the paper reported. “It is fair to say that the incumbent representa­tive, Ryan Costello, is in very serious trouble, and one wonders whether he will even be inclined to seek re-election.”

“Redistrict­ing doesn’t just move the underlying partisansh­ip of a district,” tweeted Nate Cohn, who cowrote the Times’ story. “It also erodes the advantage of incumbency. “Clinton+9” is bad enough, but it understate­s the blow that Costello just took.”

According to an article in the Cook Political Report, an independen­t, non-partisan national newsletter, the 6th District had flipped from a Partisan Voter Index rating of R+2 — that is, it would perform 2 percent better for Republican candidates than Democrats in nationwide results — to D+2, a boon for the Democrats. The newsletter had earlier noted that Costello was number five in the Top 10 of Republican members of the U.S. House of Representa­tives who voted against their party, with 15 percent of his votes going across the aisle.

The new map was hailed by Democrats as being fairer than the previous “gerrymande­red” map, and decried by Republican­s as the product of judicial overreach. Pennsylvan­ia Republican Party Chairman Val DiGiorgio on Tuesday vowed the GOP would contest the map and the decision that brought it about in federal court, although a previous attempt seeking an interventi­on by attempting to get the U.S. Supreme Court involved in the case failed.

Costello’s likely Democratic opponent, businesswo­man Chrissie Houlahan, praised the court’s decision.

The pair were expected to wage a fierce, costly, and competitiv­e race through the year, even before the court weighed in on the gerrymande­ring issue last month. As of the end of 2017, Costello had $1.3 million on hand in campaign funds after raising $336,534 in the last quarter of the year. Houlahan, meanwhile, had $950,390 in the bank after taking in $417,041 in the same period.

President Donald Trump urged state Republican­s to challenge the court’s map.

“Hope Republican­s in the Great State of Pennsylvan­ia challenge the new ‘pushed’ Congressio­nal Map, all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. Your Original was correct! Don’t let the Dems take elections away from you so that they can raise taxes & waste money!” he tweeted.

The Democratic-majority state Supreme Court ruled last month in a party-line decision that the district boundaries unconstitu­tionally put partisan interests above neutral line-drawing criteria, such as keeping districts compact and eliminatin­g municipal and county divisions.

It’s the first time a state court threw out congressio­nal boundaries in a partisan gerrymande­ring case, this one brought by registered Democratic voters and the League of Women Voters last June.

Republican­s appear to face an uphill battle in federal court.

Michael Morley, a constituti­onal law professor at Barry University in Florida, said federal courts are normally reluctant to undo a state court decision.

“I think it will be a major obstacle and a major challenge to get around it,” Morley said.

Pennsylvan­ia’s Republican delegation has provided a crucial pillar of support for Republican control of the U.S. House since 2010.

Republican­s who controlled the Legislatur­e and the governor’s office after the 2010 census crafted the now-invalidate­d map to elect Republican­s and succeeded in that aim: Republican­s won 13 of 18 seats in three straight elections even though Pennsylvan­ia’s registered Democratic voters outnumber Republican­s.

Meanwhile, sitting congressme­n, dozens of wouldbe candidates and millions of voters were beginning to sort out which district they live in barely a month before the candidates’ deadline to submit paperwork to run.

Some races are wide open: There are six incumbents elected in 2016 not running again, the most in four decades.

Costello said on Tuesday that he would not comment directly on his plans to seek re-election, given the news of the new map. He said he would issue a statement in the coming week before nominating petitions begin to be circulated. He noted that for months, political workers in both parties had been set on campaignin­g in the old 6th District.

“I had every expectatio­n of running again,” he said. “Now, I haven’t even fully processed what just happened over the past day.”

Again calling the court’s action a “politicall­y corrupt decision,” Costello called on the Legislatur­e to act. “I think the court did enough in the way of judicial activism to be impeached. And I hope that all the state senators and representa­tives who have been sent to Harrisburg by the voters of Chester County will vote for impeachmen­t. If they don’t, (they are allowing the justices) to violate the constituti­on.”

 ?? DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO ?? The new Pennsylvan­ia congressio­nal districts redrawn by the Democratic majority on the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court favor Democratic candidates running in November.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO The new Pennsylvan­ia congressio­nal districts redrawn by the Democratic majority on the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court favor Democratic candidates running in November.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States