Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Romney aide riles conservati­ve allies

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Aaron Blake of The Washington Post; by David Espo, Steve Peoples, Julie Pace, Kasie Hunt and Matthew Daly of The Associated Press and by Margaret Talev,

Mitt Romney drew new fire from conservati­ve allies on a familiar topic Wednesday — health care — as his spokesman offered unusual praise for his efforts on the issue as Massachuse­tts governor.

In an interview with Fox News Channel on Wednesday, Andrea Saul invoked Massachuse­tts’s expansion of health coverage as a defense to a harsh new ad funded by a super political action committee supporting President Barack Obama. In the spot, a steelworke­r whose plant was closed by Bain Capital blames Romney, who co-founded the firm, for his family’s loss of health insurance and his wife’s subsequent death from cancer.

“To that point, if people had been in Massachuse­tts, under Gov. Romney’s healthcare plan, they would have had health care,” Saul said in the interview. “There are a lot of people losing their jobs and losing their health care in President Obama’s economy.”

The comments were unusual for a campaign that has typically steered clear of the 2006 Massachuse­tts overhaul, sensitive to conservati­ves’ concerns that the program too closely mimics the Democratic health-care law they are determined to undo.

At an event in Iowa on Wednesday, the presumptiv­e Republican presidenti­al nominee offered his Massachuse­tts experience to show that he is an expert on healthcare overhauls.

“We’ve got to do some reforms in health care, and I have some experience doing that, as you know,” he told a crowd, after receiving a standing ovation for repeating his promise to repeal Obama’s law.

Romney has always maintained that although overhaul efforts worked for Massachuse­tts, the federal government should not force a similar solution on the nation.

He has said that on his first day as president, he would sign an executive order offering states a waiver to opt out of the law and would sign any repeal legislatio­n passed by Congress.

Although he has never disavowed the Massachuse­tts effort, he has often appeared hesitant to discuss the program, which drew harsh criticism from his Republican rivals during the presidenti­al primaries. The Massachuse­tts and federal programs both include a core requiremen­t that participan­ts buy medical insurance or pay a fee.

The twin moments of praise Wednesday for the Massachuse­tts program elicited immediate howls of protest from conservati­ves. After all, they argued, if Romney believes expanding health coverage through a government program was a positive developmen­t for Massachuse­tts residents, couldn’t Democrats argue that other Americans should receive similar protection­s?

“Andrea Saul’s appearance on Fox was a potential gold mine for Obama supporters,” conservati­ve radio host Rush Limbaugh said Wednesday. “They can say, ‘Romneycare was the basis for our health care.’” Conservati­ve commentato­r Erick Erickson termed Saul’s remark an “an unforced error of monumental idiocy” that resurfaced conservati­ve wariness of Romney.

In the Priorities USA super PAC ad to which Saul was responding, Joe Soptic, a former employee at GST Steel in Kansas City, Mo., says he no longer had health insurance after losing his job at the company. Without coverage, Soptic’s wife, Ranae, died of cancer.

But the ad does not note that Romney had left Bain by the time GST Steel declared bankruptcy in 2001. And Soptic’s wife died in 2006, five years after the plant closed.

The Obama campaign refused to call on Priorities USA Action to pull the ad. Bill Burton, a former White House aide and co-founder of the group, defended it.

Obama was in Colorado, where he embraced the “Obamacare” tag that Republican­s long ago hung on the law.

“I actually like the name because I do care,” he said in an appearance before an audience largely made up of women.

Obama told his Denver audience that Romney and Republican­s support policies “more suited to the 1950s than the 21st century.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States