Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Police advise public to run, hide or fight in mass shootings

- ERICA GOODE

The speed and deadliness of recent high-profile shootings have prompted police department­s to recommend fleeing, hiding or fighting in the event of a mass attack, instead of remaining passive and waiting for help.

The shift represents a “sea change,” said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, which recently held a meeting in Washington to discuss shootings like those in Newtown, Conn., and Aurora, Colo.

The traditiona­l advice to the public has been “don’t get involved, call 911,” Wexler said, adding, “There’s a recognitio­n in these ‘active shooter’ situations that there may be a need for citizens to act in a way that perhaps they haven’t been trained for or equipped to deal with.”

Wexler and others noted that the change echoes a transforma­tion in police procedures that began after the shooting at Columbine High School in 1999, when some department­s began telling officers who arrived first on a scene to act immediatel­y rather than waiting for backup. Since then, the approach has become widespread, as a succession of high-profile shootings across the country has prompted police agencies to be prepared to take an active approach.

“We used to sit outside and set up a perimeter and wait for the SWAT team to get there,” said Michael Dirden, an executive assistant chief of the Houston Police Department. “Now it’s a recognitio­n that time is of the essence and those initial responders have to go in,” he said, adding that since the Virginia Tech University shooting in 2007, the department has been training first responders to move in on their own when they encounter active gunfire.

Research on mass shootings over the past decade has bolstered the idea that people at the scene of an attack have a better chance of survival if they take an active stance rather than waiting to be rescued by the police, who in many cases cannot get there fast enough to prevent the loss of life.

In an analysis of 84 such shooting cases in the United States from 2000 to 2010, for example, researcher­s at Texas State University found that the average time it took for the police to respond was three minutes.

“But you see that about half the attacks are over before the police get there, even when they arrive quickly,” said J. Pete Blair, director for research of the university’s Advanced Law Enforcemen­t Rapid Response Training Center and an author of the research, which is set to be published in a book this year. In the absence of a police presence, how victims responded often made the difference between life and death, Blair said.

In 16 of the attacks studied by the researcher­s, civilians were able to stop the perpetrato­r, subduing him in 13 cases and shooting him in three cases. In other attacks, civilians have obstructed or delayed the gunman until the police arrived. As part of the research, Blair and his colleagues looked at survival rates and the actions taken by people in classrooms under attack during the Virginia Tech massacre, in which Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 students and teachers before killing himself.

In two classrooms, the students and instructor­s tried to hide or play dead after Cho entered. Nearly all were shot, and most died. In a third classroom, Professor Liviu Librescu, a Holocaust survivor, told his students to jump out the second-story window while he tried to hold the classroom door shut, delaying Cho from coming in. Librescu was killed, but many of the students survived, and only three were injured by gunfire. In another classroom, where the students and teacher blocked the door with a heavy desk and held it in place, Cho could not get in, and everyone lived.

Two instructio­nal videos, one produced by Houston’s Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security and the other by the University of Wisconsin’s Police Department, recommend that civilians fight an attacker if options such as escaping or hiding are not available.

Susan Riseling, chief of police at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, said the Virginia Tech episode had changed her thinking about how to advise students because it was clear that Cho had “one goal, and that seemed to be to kill as many people as possible before ending his life.”

The department’s video, screened during training sessions around the state but not available online, tells students to escape or conceal themselves if possible, but if those options are not available, to fight. In the video, students are shown throwing a garbage can at an attacker and charging at him as a group.

“If you’re face-to-face and you know that this person is all about death, you’ve got to take some action to fight,” Riseling said.

What she worries about most, she said, is that mass shootings are becoming so common that she suspects people have begun to accept them as a normal part of life.

“That’s the sad part of it,” Riseling said. “This should never be normal.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States