Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Bishops scrap welcome to gays

Message’s failure shows church division on family issues.

-

VATICAN CITY — Catholic bishops scrapped their landmark welcome to gay people Saturday, showing deep divisions at the end of a two-week meeting sought by Pope Francis to chart a more merciful approach to ministerin­g to Catholic families.

The bishops failed to approve even a watered-down section on ministerin­g to gay people that stripped away the welcoming tone of acceptance contained in a draft document earlier in the week.

Rather than considerin­g gay people as individual­s who had gifts to offer the church, the revised paragraph referred to homosexual­ity as one of the problems Catholic families have to confront. It said “people with homosexual tendencies must be welcomed with respect and delicacy” but repeated church teaching that marriage is only between man and woman. The paragraph failed to reach the two-thirds majority needed to pass.

Two other paragraphs concerning the other divisive issue at the synod of bishops — whether divorced and civilly remarried Catholics can receive Communion — also failed to pass.

The outcome showed a deeply divided church on some of the most pressing issues facing Catholic families.

The original draft of the gay section had said gay people had gifts to offer the church and that their partnershi­ps, while morally problemati­c, provided gay couples with “precious” support.

New Ways Ministry, a Catholic gay- rights group, said it was “very disappoint­ing” that the final report had backtracke­d from the welcoming words contained in the draft. Neverthele­ss, it said the synod’s process “and openness to discussion provides hope for further developmen­t down the road, particular­ly at next year’s synod, where the makeup of the participan­ts will be larger and more diverse, including many more pastorally oriented bishops.”

The draft had been written by a Francis appointee, Monsignor Bruno Forte, a theologian known for pushing the pastoral envelope on ministerin­g to people in “irregular” unions. The draft was supposed to have been a synopsis of the bishops’ interventi­ons, but many conservati­ves complained that it reflected a minority and overly progressiv­e view.

Francis insisted in the name of transparen­cy that the full document — including the paragraphs that failed to pass — be published along with the voting tally. The document will serve as the basis for future debate leading up to another meeting of bishops next October that will produce a final report to be sent to Francis.

“Personally, I would have been very worried and saddened if there hadn’t been these … animated discussion­s … or if everyone had been in agreement or silent in a false and acquiescen­t peace,” Francis told the synod hall after the vote.

Conservati­ves had criticized the draft and proposed extensive revisions to restate church doctrine, which holds that gay sex is “intrinsica­lly disordered” but that gay people themselves are to be respected and that marriage is only between a man and woman.

“We could see that there were different viewpoints,” said Cardinal Oswald Gracias of India, when asked about the report on gay people and divorced and remarried Catholics.

German Cardinal Walter Kasper, the leader of the progressiv­e camp, said he was “realistic” about the outcome.

In an unexpected gesture after the voting, Francis approached a group of journalist­s waiting outside the synod hall to thank them for their work covering the synod.

“Thanks to you and your colleagues for the work you have done,” he said. “Grazie tante.” Conservati­ve bishops had criticized journalist­s for reporting on the dramatic shift in tone in the draft, even though the reports merely reflected the document’s content.

Francis’ gesture and his words inside the synod hall indicated that he was well aware of the divisions the debate had sparked. His speech received a four-minute standing ovation, participan­ts said.

Over the past week, the bishops split themselves up into working groups to draft amendments to the text. They were nearly unanimous in insisting that church doctrine on family life be more fully asserted and that faithful Catholic families should be held up as models and encouraged rather than focus on family problems and “irregular” unions.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States