Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

FDA bans 19 chemicals from antibacter­ial soaps

- MATTHEW PERRONE

WASHINGTON — The federal government Friday banned more than a dozen chemicals long used in antibacter­ial soaps, saying manufactur­ers failed to show they are safe and kill germs. “We have no scientific evidence that they are any better than plain soap and water,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, the Food and Drug Administra­tion’s drug center director, in a statement.

Friday’s decision primarily targets two once-ubiquitous ingredient­s — triclosan and triclocarb­an — that some limited animal research suggests can interfere with hormone levels and spur drug-resistant bacteria.

The FDA is collecting informatio­n on hand sanitizers used in health care settings that contain triclosan, though not all hand sanitizers do. For example, Gojo Industries Inc.’s popular Purell doesn’t use triclosan, but rather relies on ethyl alcohol, Samantha Williams, a company spokesman, said in an email.

Triclosan and triclocarb­an have long been under scrutiny, and a cleaning industry spokesman said most companies have already removed the now banned 19 chemicals from their soaps and washes.

The FDA said it will allow companies more time to provide data on three other chemicals, which are still in a majority of products sold today.

The agency told manufactur­ers nearly three years ago that they must show their products are safe and effective. Regulators said Friday that the data submitted for the chemicals did not meet federal standards for proving safety and effectiven­ess.

“Consumers may think antibacter­ial washes are more effective at preventing the spread of germs,” Woodcock said in a statement. “In fact, some data

suggests that antibacter­ial ingredient­s may do more harm than good over the long-term.”

The FDA ban comes more than 40 years after Congress asked the agency to evaluate triclosan and dozens of other antiseptic ingredient­s. Ultimately, the government agreed to publish its findings only after a three-year legal battle with an environmen­tal group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, which accused the FDA of delaying a decision on the safety of triclosan.

The group cited research by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that found triclosan in the urine of threequart­ers of Americans tested for various chemicals.

The FDA is now re-evaluating soaps and washes used by consumers and health profession­als.

The American Cleaning Institute, a cleaning chemical associatio­n, disputed the FDA’s findings, saying in a statement “the FDA already has in its hands data that shows the safety and effectiven­ess of antibacter­ial soaps.”

The group’s spokesman said companies are planning to submit data on three chemicals currently used by industry: benzalkoni­um chloride, benzethoni­um chloride and chloroxyle­nol. The FDA delayed making a decision on those chemicals for one year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States