Dental benefits pacts get support

A $366 million pair of contracts to manage dental benefits for Arkansans on Medicaid received the blessing of state lawmakers Wednesday, despite an ongoing lawsuit by a disqualified bidder for the work.

The state’s chief procurement officer, joined by officials with the Department of Human Services, spent more than an hour offering assurances to a legislative committee that the procurement process had been followed fairly.

The meeting came a month after one of the bidders of the contracts, Boston-based DentaQuest, filed suit in Pulaski County Circuit Court alleging that Procurement Director Edward Armstrong wrongly disqualified the company after learning it was the subject of an out-of-state lawsuit.

Lawmakers on the Review Subcommittee of the Arkansas Legislative Council appeared comfortable with Armstrong’s answers to their questions and voted to review the contracts. The action is a sign of the Legislature’s approval of the deal, but it is nonbinding.

A committee co-chairman, Rep. Jon Eubanks, R-Paris, said it would have been the governor’s prerogative to move ahead with the contracts had lawmakers decided against reviewing it.

The contracts are to begin Jan. 1, although Legislative and Government Affairs Chief Kelley Linck of the Human Services Department said the winners, Delta Dental in Sherwood and Florida-based Managed Care of North America, are ready to start laying groundwork in the state.

None of the companies were allowed to testify at Wednesday’s meeting, which was closed to public comment.

Human services officials said they had not explored how much it will cost to delay authorizing the contracts until DentaQuest’s lawsuit is resolved.

At the end of April, DentaQuest sought a temporary restraining order to halt the state from executing its contracts with the winning bidders.

The request, and the company’s overall lawsuit, is pending before Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen.

DentaQuest originally scored the highest among four bidders for the dental benefits contracts, but was disqualified along with a lower bidder in February for failing to disclose lawsuits involving similar services they were providing in other states.