Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Pay as we go

How to fix the state’s highways

-

Every few years Arkansas’ taxpaying voters and drivers have been adopting stopgap programs to fix the state’s washboard roads. Back in what now seems long-ago 2011, the electorate approved a $575-million bond issue to finance $1.2 billion’s worth of work on the roads that were part of the interstate system of highways. The next year, 2012, voters tired of bumping along approved $1.8 billion for road work on selected stretches of highways important to regional developmen­t. And now Governor and builder-in-chief Asa Hutchinson has put it plain in a speech to the state’s Economic Developmen­t Commission:

“In my view, we need to bring a highway plan to the voters in 2018 and put it on the ballot and give the voters an opportunit­y to develop a highway plan. So I hope that y’all will be open to that.” Which would be fair enough — and responsibl­e enough. Let the people rule.

Or must Arkansas wait for a bridge to collapse or a major crash before finally taking action? Which was the frightful scenario outlined by a couple of highly responsibl­e state legislator­s, Representa­tive Dan Douglas of Bentonvill­e and Speaker of the House Jeremy Gillam of Judsonia, the day before the governor spoke.

Both of those luminaries deserve more than a hearing; they deserve a following when it comes to this state’s deteriorat­ing roads. So does Governor Hutchinson, who noted: “As you drive around the farm-to-market roads, the overlay that we need to have in rural Arkansas is critically important, so though we have enhanced our highway funding with $200 million more in [federal] funding with the state match [of some $50 million], we still need to have more for a long-term highway plan.”

And it’s thinking in the long term that so often has been lacking when it comes to highway planning and financing in this state. As exemplifie­d by the aginners who are always making the perfect the enemy of the good by holding up some unattainab­le, only theoretica­l goal as an alternativ­e to what can be done now.

Some lawmakers said they opposed Douglas’ literally constructi­ve bill during the legislativ­e session in part because ending the current 6.5 percent exemption on the sales tax when it comes to gasoline and motor fuel in general would be the same as about a 22-cent tax increase if and when the price of gas went to $4 a gallon. (It’s now about 2 bucks a gallon.)

Well, that’ll be the day when inflation is eliminated from the economy.

And while we’re arguing about what the price of gas could be in 5 or 10 years, the state’s highways continue to crumble.

Conclusion: It’s time this state did something about its roads, not just debated about them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States