Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

‘Three-for-three’ plan to aid Dreamers falters

- nwadg.com/ usimmigrat­ion Immigratio­n data, U.S. border map Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Ken Thomas, Lisa Mascaro, Zeke Miller and Catherine Lucey of The Associated Press; and by Mike DeBonis and Josh Dawsey of

WASHINGTON — The White House said Wednesday that it does not favor an immigratio­n agreement with Congress that would involve extending protection­s for young people in the country illegally for three years in exchange for three years of border wall funding.

Deputy press secretary Raj Shah said the administra­tion continues to negotiate an immigratio­n overhaul that would address the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that protects young people in the country illegally from deportatio­n, while also stopping illegal immigratio­n and modernizin­g the legal immigratio­n system.

Two Republican officials briefed on the talks said the “three- for- three” proposal had been floated in stafflevel discussion­s in recent days.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly. The discussion­s were first reported by The Washington Post, which said the idea was being discussed as part of an upcoming spending bill. Congress must pass a new spending bill before a March 23 deadline, and congressio­nal negotiator­s are aiming to release draft legislatio­n as soon as this week.

President Donald Trump has proposed a path to citizenshi­p for about 1.8 million people who were illegally brought to the U.S. as children, in exchange for $25 billion for a border wall with Mexico and other security measures, along with curbing legal immigratio­n.

But his proposal never gained bipartisan momentum — with Democrats rejecting the legal immigratio­n cutbacks even as they conceded funding for the border wall — and the measure won only 39 votes in a Feb. 15 Senate test vote. A bill that preserved the $25 billion in wall funding but set aside most of the legal immigratio­n cutbacks won 54 votes, though still short of the 60 necessary for passage.

The Post reported that the outlines of the new immigratio­n proposal are much narrower, said the officials familiar with the offer: a two- or three-year extension of the deferred-action program, which now protects about 690,000 people, coupled with an unspecifie­d amount of border wall funding — hewing to a framework that some GOP moderates explored in the aftermath of February’s failed Senate votes.

A three-year deferred-action extension would essentiall­y remove immigratio­n from the congressio­nal agenda until after the 2020 presidenti­al election by removing the threat of deportatio­n for the young people covered by the program, often referred to as Dreamers.

AshLee Strong, a spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declined to address the discussion­s. “We aren’t negotiatin­g the [spending bill] through the press,” she said.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment Wednesday morning.

Ryan on Wednesday told reporters that he would not discuss specific aspects of the spending bill but said, “Our goal is to get this done as fast as possible. Stay tuned.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States