Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Censored in Springdale

- Mike Masterson Mike Masterson is a longtime Arkansas journalist. Email him at mmasterson@arkansason­line.com.

Powers that be at Springdale’s Har-Ber High School found themselves in the middle of a major statewide flap last week after yanking an admirable news story and accompanyi­ng editorial by the HarBer Herald that alleged several football players had improperly transferre­d to Springdale High School.

Then they suspended the student-run publicatio­n, which reportedly hasn’t published since the disputed story ran on Oct. 30.

The administra­tors can’t fault anyone but themselves for national humiliatio­n heaped upon them after initially ordering the story be pulled from the Herald because (ready for this?) they felt the story reflected poorly on them. What irony.

The big problem they had in taking such a rash step is the state law passed in 1995 which provided added protection­s to student newspapers.

Although Springdale District administra­tors said they were not involved in suspending the Herald’s publicatio­n, district Superinten­dent Jim Rollins wrote a letter to the paper’s adviser, Karla Sprague, reported by BuzzFeed News, which called the article “intentiona­lly negative, demeaning, derogatory, hurtful and potentiall­y harmful to the students addressed in those articles.”

Rollins went on to contend the story headlined “Athletes’ transfers in question/Former Wildcats use academics to justify hardship requests” also was “divisive and disruptive” to the school community.

What Rollins failed to dispute in his litany of disparagem­ents was the factual accuracy of the Herald’s story, a critical aspect when it comes to enterprise reporting. And little did he realize it would be this unjustifie­d and drastic decision that in fact heaped negative and disruptive attention on the school’s administra­tion.

The school district and the Arkansas Activities Associatio­n both approved these transfers, most of which were requested based on a desire, the Herald reported, to be in a particular academic program at Springdale High not offered at Har-Ber.

That story also quoted two transfer students who implied football played a part in their decisions. One is quoted saying he could better showcase his talents at Springdale High.

District policy on such matters says “specific curriculum or instructio­nal opportunit­ies” are among acceptable reasons for students to seek transfer to another school within Springdale, but athletic or extracurri­cular opportunit­ies are not listed.

The Associated Press reported the district instructed Sprague to remove the story from the Herald website, which it was. Har-Ber principal Paul Griep told Sprague nothing else could be published until new administra­tive guidelines for the Herald could be implemente­d. My translatio­n: We need to review and possibly censor any story before publicatio­n.

BuzzFeed also reported that Sprague’s job was threatened. She wisely wasn’t commenting on any of this fine mess.

Meanwhile, this clear censorship of what I call a fine example of groundbrea­king reporting as the First Amendment intended by any newspaper, as well as by BuzzFeed, unleashed a groundswel­l of support for the students and Sprague’s mentorship.

Reaction came from several directions, including the Student Press Law Center and the Arkansas Press Associatio­n.

I especially appreciate­d the comments of Justin Turner in a story from this newspaper’s Dave Perozek. Turner’s a Sheridan High School journalism teacher and director of the Arkansas Journalism Education Associatio­n, who said that the district was not following the law passed in 1995 if the published reports were accurate. It gave student journalist­s protection beyond the First Amendment, explaining that the law tells school boards to formulate a policy recognizin­g “that ‘students may exercise their right of expression’ in school-sponsored publicatio­ns, regardless of whether those publicatio­ns are supported financiall­y by the school or by use of school facilities, or are produced by a class.”

The law cites specific reasons a school may censor a student publicatio­n. For example, if the material can be considered to be obscene to minors, is libelous or slanderous, is an unwarrante­d invasion of privacy, creates a “clear and present danger” of crimes on campus or disrupting the school’s operation.

“A story about a football team and players switching schools does not fit any of those categories,” Turner told Perozek. Besides, he said, schools should be teaching students to respect the First Amendment.

“And for a school to censor students for exercising those rights is not only illegal, but it goes against the mission of the school,” Turner said. “I know it’s incredibly tough as a teacher to teach kids about their rights and then be told by the district to go against what you’re teaching.”

In what I suppose could be construed as a happy ending to this Ozark disturbanc­e that never should have formed into a hurricane, the district (after much justifiabl­y negative feedback) allowed the stories in question to be reposted to the paper’s website.

“After continued considerat­ion of the legal landscape, the Springdale School District has concluded that the Har-Ber Herald articles may be reposted,” the district’s communicat­ions director Rick Schaeffer wrote in a statement. “This matter is complex, challengin­g and has merited thorough review. The social and emotional well-being of all students has been and continues to be a priority of the district.”

That was all the district has to say about the matter, he concluded. I’ll just bet.

Left glaringly unaddresse­d was the matter of allowing the Herald to resume publishing as usual because administra­tors reportedly were still considerin­g other matters related to the paper other than this story, whatever that means.

Sounds to me as if someone or ones in administra­tion are working overtime to determine some way to control these unruly, upstart, loose-cannon, idealistic student journalist­s and their competent adviser who dare to accurately, fairly and objectivel­y report news even when it is critical or embarrassi­ng toward them.

Gawd knows, our national “profession­al” press at its uppermost levels could use a lot of that today.

Believe I’ll just nominate this story for national recognitio­n among the high school ranks. Betcha a dollar it wins.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States