Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. probe criticizes 737 Max inspectors

FAA misled Congress, agency says

- ALAN LEVIN

American aviation regulators misled Congress about a whistleblo­wer’s allegation that many inspectors performing safety assessment­s on the now-grounded Boeing Co. 737 Max airplane weren’t properly qualified to certify pilots or assess pilot training, a government investigat­ive agency has concluded.

The Office of Special Counsel, a federal agency that investigat­es whistleblo­wer complaints, called Federal Aviation Administra­tion assertions on the case “misleading,” and said the agency’s response to lawmakers “raises significan­t concerns.”

The whistleblo­wer’s charges became public in April when Sen. Roger Wicker, a Mississipp­i Republican who is chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transporta­tion Committee, issued a press release. At the time, the FAA disputed the allegation­s, insisting in responses to Congress that its pilots were properly qualified.

The FAA pilots about whom qualificat­ion issues were raised are called aviation safety inspectors. They administer skill tests of other pilots and perform other duties, including sitting on groups called Flight Standardiz­ation Boards. The board was involved in approving the pilot training criteria for the 737 Max.

The FAA, which disputed the findings Monday night, issued a second statement Tuesday with a stronger denial.

“The FAA stands behind its response to Senator Wicker’s questions about the qualificat­ions of Flight Standardiz­ation Board members,”

the agency said in the latest statement. The agency’s communicat­ions to the lawmaker were cited in the Office of Special Counsel report.

The issue had no bearing on decisions about pilottrain­ing requiremen­ts on the 737 Max, the agency said.

“All of the aviation safety inspectors who participat­ed in the evaluation of the Boeing 737 Max were fully qualified for those activities,” the agency said.

The Office of Special Counsel, however, sided with the whistleblo­wer and said

some internal FAA reviews had concluded the same thing. It found that 16 of 22 FAA pilots conducting safety reviews, including making decisions on the 737 Max when it came into service two years ago, “lacked proper training and accreditat­ion,” according to the special counsel’s letter to President Donald Trump. The letter was first reported by The Washington Post.

The two crashes of the 737 Max, which led to 346 deaths, were “closely linked with crew training resources and familiarit­y with operationa­l procedures” — which were under the authority of some of the improperly trained pilots, the letter said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States