Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

President’s lawyers weigh strategy

- MICHAEL D. SHEAR

WASHINGTON — The White House is reviewing an invitation from House Democrats for President Donald Trump’s legal team to participat­e in the first Judiciary Committee impeachmen­t hearing next week, even as his lawyers privately question whether to engage with a proceeding his administra­tion branded “an illegitima­te sham partisan process” to drive Trump from office.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, wrote to the president on Tuesday offering him or his lawyers the opportunit­y to appear before lawmakers at a Dec. 4 hearing with constituti­onal scholars to discuss the historical precedents for impeachmen­t, the definition of an impeachabl­e offense and whether Trump’s actions meet the bar for removal.

In a statement on Wednesday, Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary, did not give any indication about whether Trump or his lawyers intended to accept the invitation. But people familiar with the president’s legal strategy have said privately that they are deeply suspicious of taking part in a process they view as unfair to Trump.

“What is obvious to every

American is that this letter comes at the end of an illegitima­te sham partisan process,” Grisham said in the statement. “The president has done nothing wrong, and the Democrats know it.”

Next week’s hearing will begin a new phase in the inquiry, as the Judiciary

Committee prepares to draft articles of impeachmen­t related to charges that Trump abused his power to enlist Ukraine in tarnishing his political rivals. The committee is also expected to consider an article of impeachmen­t charging that Trump obstructed the investigat­ion by blocking witnesses from testifying and refusing to provide documents.

Democrats are also weighing whether to draft an obstructio­n-of-justice article based on the report by Robert Mueller, the special counsel who investigat­ed Russia’s interferen­ce in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign.

The bulk of the charges, however, will be based on evidence to be laid out in a detailed report by the House Intelligen­ce Committee after weeks of public and private deposition­s of current and former administra­tion officials on the Ukraine affair. The report, which Democrats have said will be submitted soon after Thanksgivi­ng, is expected to charge the president with abusing his power by appealing to a foreign government for help in the 2020 presidenti­al election. It will outline Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukrainian leaders to announce investigat­ions of former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats, while denying the country’s

president a White House meeting and withholdin­g nearly $400 million in military assistance.

“I remain committed to ensuring a fair and informativ­e process,” Nadler wrote to Trump in his letter. He noted that he retained the right under the rules of the impeachmen­t inquiry to deny the president participat­ion in the proceeding­s if the White House continued to stonewall witnesses and other evidence.

Nadler gave the president and his lawyers until 6 p.m. Sunday to decide whether they want to be part of the Dec. 4 hearing.

The question of how much the president and his legal advisers decide to participat­e is likely to be a contentiou­s one as his team wrangles with Democrats over Trump’s rights to present his defense to lawmakers and the public.

Lawyers for former presidents Richard M. Nixon and Bill Clinton worked to some extent with the Judiciary Committee to present defenses for their clients during impeachmen­t proceeding­s. But Trump and his allies on Capitol Hill have repeatedly criticized the Democratic-led impeachmen­t inquiry as illegitima­te.

In a letter to House Democratic leaders shortly after they formally opened the impeachmen­t inquiry, Pat Cipollone, the White House counsel, said Trump would refuse to cooperate in any way with the inquiry.

“In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constituti­on, the executive branch, and all future occupants of the office of the presidency, President Trump and his administra­tion cannot participat­e in your partisan and unconstitu­tional inquiry under these circumstan­ces,” Cipollone wrote.

On Tuesday, Trump claimed on Twitter that he “would actually like people to testify” as part of the inquiry because he believes they would say he did nothing wrong. But he also blasted the Democratic investigat­ion, calling it a “phony Impeachmen­t Hoax” and saying it is “a Democrat Scam that is going nowhere.”

A person familiar with deliberati­ons among the president’s legal team said Wednesday morning that no decision had been made about whether to engage in a public defense of the president during the Judiciary Committee hearings.

Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said in an interview on Wednesday that he would not blame the White House for declining to participat­e, underscori­ng skepticism among the president’s allies about whether it would be a fair forum for the president.

“If they come, great,” he said. “If they don’t, I would understand completely because what is the use of this hearing?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States