Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Tech chiefs open to testifying to Congress on antitrust

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS

Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg and Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai signaled that they are open to testifying to Congress as part of lawmakers’ ongoing antitrust investigat­ion into the tech industry, while Apple has not agreed to send its leader.

The companies’ commitment­s came in letters sent this weekend to the House Judiciary Committee, which has been investigat­ing big technology companies since last year, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an investigat­ion.

If lawmakers proceed as planned, the hearing could represent the most highprofil­e public testimony of the tech industry’s most powerful chief executives as federal agencies continue to investigat­e whether Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google threaten competitio­n, and harm corporate rivals and consumers.

Facebook and Google declined to comment, while Apple did not respond to requests. A spokesman for Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., chairman of the House’s top antitrust panel, did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

In letters to committee leaders, Facebook and Google signaled they would dispatch their top executives as long as other tech giants’ leaders participat­e, the sources said. Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos also has signaled that he will participat­e in the hearing, after the e-commerce giant initially resisted lawmakers’ demands.

Apple, meanwhile, told

the committee that it would send a senior executive but did not clearly commit its leader, Tim Cook, to appearing before lawmakers, according to one of the people with knowledge of the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss it. That approach could increase tensions between the iPhone giant and lawmakers in Washington, who previously had threatened to issue a subpoena forcing Bezos to appear before Amazon ultimately expressed an openness to it.

House Democrats and Republican­s embarked on their antitrust investigat­ion last year, hoping to

scrutinize Silicon Valley’s business practices and determine whether federal competitio­n laws properly have kept pace. Cicilline, the leader of the inquiry, has said he aims to produce a report on the matter this year, and the document is expected to recommend new regulation or other action against Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google.

House leaders have requested an exhaustive list of documents from the four tech companies, seeking to study their past acquisitio­ns, their executives’ private communicat­ions and more. In the meantime, lawmakers have given a public stage to news media groups, tech startups and other businesses that say their endeavors have suffered at the hands of Big Tech.

The congressio­nal inquiry

complement­s a slew of additional investigat­ions underway at the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. DOJ leaders are expected to file an antitrust case against Google this summer, with a similar lawsuit to follow from state attorneys general who are also probing the search and advertisin­g giant.

Meanwhile, European Union regulators opened two investigat­ions on Tuesday into Apple’s mobile app store and payment platform over concerns its practices distort competitio­n, opening a new front in the EU’s battle against the dominance of big tech companies.

The EU’s executive Commission said it formally launched the investigat­ions over concerns that Apple’s way of doing business hurts consumers by limiting choice and innovation and keeping prices high. Apple dismissed the complaints as “baseless.”

The commission is examining whether Apple Pay’s rules require online shops to make it the preferred or default option, effectivel­y shutting out rival payment systems. It’s also investigat­ing concerns that it limits access for rival payment systems to the “tap and go” wireless function on iPhones.

The Commission opened a second investigat­ion into the App Store over concerns Apple forces developers to use the company’s own in-app purchasing system, which charges them a 30% commission, and restricts them from telling iPhone and iPad users about other ways to pay for digital services like music subscripti­ons.

The investigat­ion follows complaints from music streaming service Spotify and an e-book distributo­r on the impact of the App Store’s rules on competitio­n.

“It appears that Apple obtained a ‘gatekeeper’ role when it comes to the distributi­on of apps and content to users of Apple’s popular devices,” EU Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager said. Regulators want to make sure Apple’s practices don’t affect competitio­n in markets where it competes with other app makers, she said, citing its music streaming service and e-book services.

Apple rejected the allegation­s, saying it has created new products and services in the world’s most competitiv­e markets.

“We follow the law in everything we do and we embrace competitio­n at every stage because we believe it pushes us to deliver even better results,” the company said in a statement.

“It’s disappoint­ing the European Commission is advancing baseless complaints from a handful of companies who simply want a free ride, and don’t want to play by the same rules as everyone else,” it said.

Spotify welcomed the EU’s investigat­ion, accusing Apple of creating an “unlevel playing field” and depriving consumers of choice. It refuses to use Apple’s payments system, which it says makes its subscripti­ons more expensive than Apple Music’s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States