Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

German health chief faces threats, wins fans

- WILLIAM GLUCROFT

BERLIN — After the chancellor himself, one of the most scrutinize­d positions in Germany’s new government is the health minister, a doctor who is a household name and has received death threats for his stern advice on handling the pandemic.

Karl Lauterbach, a 58-yearold with degrees from Harvard in public health and epidemiolo­gy, became a kind of Anthony Fauci equivalent as the pandemic unfolded and he was constantly in the public eye on German TV and in social media. He became known for his strict prescripti­ons for how Germany could protect itself from the spread of the disease.

There was even a “WeWantKarl” Twitter hashtag supporting his candidacy in the run-up to his appointmen­t.

Now he oversees the sprawling, $56 billion Health Ministry as the country faces another surge of coronaviru­s infections and hospitaliz­ations, and the prospect of more omicron cases. On Friday, the parliament passed a vaccine mandate for all health care workers starting March 15.

“Such a vaccine mandate is necessary because it is completely unacceptab­le that at the end of the second year of this pandemic, people who live in care homes die unnecessar­ily because workers there are unvaccinat­ed,” he told the Bundestag.

Lauterbach’s immediate task is seeing to 30 million more vaccinatio­ns by year’s end — whether first, second or booster doses — a goal set under the previous government that he confirmed he will carry out.

The hoped-for result is a question of logistics — the ministry is responsibl­e for getting supply to the states — and also willingnes­s. With uptake flagging well below what many scientists say is needed to reach herd immunity, a vaccine mandate for the general public is still in the cards.

So far, 71% of Germans have received at least one dose of a vaccine, but there remains a vigorous anti-vaccine movement that stages regular protests. There are opinion polls, however, that show increasing support for mandatory vaccinatio­ns, including one suggesting that some 57% of the population is in favor.

Mandates are controvers­ial in Germany, and Lauterbach’s critics say his pandemic prediction­s can be overblown. He has had to walk back his opposition to sporting events, even without crowds, which was just one of the stringent measures he advocated for.

Despite Lauterbach’s expertise and prominence, it wasn’t originally clear he would even get the job, with the local media full of reports that party leaders feared that his uncompromi­sing style meant he wouldn’t be a team player.

Yet, Lauterbach showed his ability to toe the line in November when he supported a bill that did away with the existing legal basis for lockdowns and closures, replacing it with new vaccinatio­n and testing requiremen­ts for much of public life — in contradict­ion to his past stances.

“The law that ends the health emergency has many measures that will help states tackle the pandemic,” he said at the time on Markus Lanz’s political talk show.

The change led to some confusion and delays in rolling out new rules, leaving state leaders scrambling to find the legal authority to respond to a record-breaking fourth wave of infections that has seen tens of thousands of new daily cases. Many of those measures were restored with Friday’s legislatio­n.

“When you’re [health] minister, everything gets unloaded on you. Other than the chancellor, it’s one of the most challengin­g jobs — and not only because of the pandemic,” said Ulla Schmidt, a retired Social Democratic lawmaker and the party’s last health minister, serving from 2001-09.

At a news conference after his swearing-in on Wednesday, Lauterbach promised that policy would be dictated by science.

“Health policy, as I see it, can only be successful when it’s anchored in evidence-based medicine,” he said.

Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, a virologist at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, however, cautioned against stressing Lauterbach’s scientific background over his political present.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States