Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Best not take Real World issues to Disney World

- JOHN ROSEMOND Write to family psychologi­st John Rosemond at The Leadership Parenting Institute,420 Craven St.,New Bern, N.C.,28560 or email questions@rosemond.com. Due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

Q

We see my husband’s 9-year-old son every other weekend and two weeks in the summer. He has major problems in school with behavior and doing his work. He’s well behaved when he’s with us, but his mother lets him get away with a lot. Also, she thinks teachers should punish for school problems and she should punish for home problems (but she doesn’t). We have planned a trip to Disney World and have told Charlie that if he doesn’t do his schoolwork between now and then, we will not give him spending money for the trip. He did his work for a week, then stopped. Now we’re second-guessing our decision. What do you think?

A

My general rule is when divorced parents do not agree on disciplina­ry matters, the noncustodi­al parent (NCP) should not discipline for behaviors/problems that only occur while the child is in the care of the custodial parent (CP). The rationale is practical, not psychologi­cal. In a situation of this sort, punishment meted out by the NCP is not likely to have any lasting positive effect and may cause the child to begin resisting visitation. The CP may also seize the opportunit­y to “score” with the child by compensati­ng for, and thus effectivel­y neutralizi­ng, the NCP’s discipline. Under the circumstan­ces, the original problem could well worsen.

Let’s say you follow through with your original plan and don’t give Charlie spending money at Disney World. When he returns to his mother’s, she makes it up to him by taking him on a relatively lavish shopping spree. Ultimately, Charlie is rewarded for not doing well in school. Then, with his mother’s subtle (or not-so-subtle) encouragem­ent, he begins resisting visitation. Suddenly, despite the undeniable fact that you have Charlie’s best interests at heart, you are the villain in an unfolding soap opera that has the potential of spiraling quickly downward. In the end, Charlie is the loser, big time.

So, when you arrive at Disney World, just give Charlie a reasonable amount of money to use as frivolousl­y as he chooses. Don’t even say, “We’ve changed our minds.” Just give it to him. Do all you can to create a family experience that will stand out in Charlie’s memories of his childhood forever. Disney World, after all, is not the place to make an issue of things that have happened in the Real World.

When divorced parents agree on childreari­ng matters, then I encourage a tagteam approach to discipline. It should be limited to major behavior or school performanc­e problems and only be employed upon request of the parent in whose “territory” the problem occurred or is occurring. In the above example, if Charlie’s mom had requested of her ex that he follow through with certain consequenc­es when Charlie fails to do his work in school, it would be appropriat­e for him to do so (but it is also his right to refuse). As do all children in all family situations, Charlie needs to hear the same message from every significan­t adult in his life. But again, I wouldn’t deliver the message at Disney World.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States