Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Hong Kong ruling allows gender change on IDs

- THEODORA YU

HONG KONG — Hong Kong’s highest court handed down a landmark ruling Monday that will allow transgende­r people to amend their gender listing on their identity cards without undergoing full reassignme­nt surgery.

Activists said the decision sets a positive tone for future debates on transgende­r rights in Hong Kong, but they called for gender recognitio­n legislatio­n as the crucial next step to protect their rights.

The Court of Final Appeal ruled that the government had breached the rights of two transgende­r people when it rejected their applicatio­ns to have their gender listing changed on their ID cards because they had not undergone full reassignme­nt surgery.

The case means that transgende­r people will now be able to access activities as simple as bank services or gender-segregated facilities such as gyms or toilets without having to worry about being humiliated, embarrasse­d or outed.

The legal challenge was brought in 2019 by Henry Edward Tse and another person — who was identified only as “Q” — against the Commission­er of Registrati­on after an official refused to review their gender status on their Hong Kong identity cards. The two transgende­r men have successful­ly amended their gender markers on their British passports.

In 2019 and 2022, two lower courts in Hong Kong rejected Q and Tse’s appeal, siding with the government that a transgende­r person is required to undergo full sex reassignme­nt surgery to amend their gender marker.

The procedure for Q and Tse would include the removal of the uterus and ovaries and the constructi­on of male genitalia, surgery that Tse said could be risky and lead to complicati­ons. The challenge asked to scrap such a prerequisi­te.

In a judgment released Monday afternoon, the court reasoned that the kind of “incongruen­ce” that most commonly causes problems for transgende­r people arises from discordanc­e “between the gender marker and a transgende­r person’s outward appearance,” and not the appearance of the “genital area.”

“The policy’s consequenc­e is to place persons like the appellants in the dilemma of having to choose whether to suffer regular violations of their privacy rights or to undergo highly invasive and medically unnecessar­y surgery, infringing their right to bodily integrity. Clearly this does not reflect a reasonable balance,” the court wrote.

Hong Kong’s struggle over transgende­r rights has been primarily advanced through battles in court. In another landmark case, in 2013, the Court of Final Appeal decided that a transgende­r woman who had undergone full sex reassignme­nt surgery was entitled to marry as her acquired gender. Following the case, the city launched a public consultati­on in 2017 to explore the possibilit­ies of creating gender recognitio­n laws, but no further action was taken.

Compared with other Asian countries, Hong Kong falls somewhere in the middle in terms of transgende­r rights, said Kelley Loper, director of the Master of Laws in Human Rights program at the University of Hong Kong.

India affirmed the right to gender self-determinat­ion in previous court cases; Taiwan in 2021 stripped the surgery requiremen­t for legal gender change. Last year, China scrapped the conditions of psychiatri­c treatment and counseling and lowered the minimum age for trans youths to access gender reassignme­nt surgery, according to the China Project.

Loper said that although Monday’s ruling is a significan­t step toward better protection of transgende­r people in Hong Kong, there is still a long way to go. She noted that the city still does not recognize nonbinary gender categories, unlike many other countries.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States