Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Texas court rules against woman

She leaves state for abortion before challenge to ban rejected

- PAUL J. WEBER AND JAMIE STENGLE

AUSTIN, Texas — A pregnant Texas woman whose fetus has a fatal condition left the state to get an abortion elsewhere before the state Supreme Court on Monday rejected her unpreceden­ted challenge of one of the most restrictiv­e bans in the U.S.

Kate Cox, a 31-year-old mother of two, had spent nearly a week seeking court permission in Texas to end her pregnancy, but her attorney said she could not wait any longer and left the state. Her baby has a condition known as trisomy 18, which has low survival rates, and her lawsuit argued that continuing the pregnancy jeopardize­d both her health and ability to have more children.

Texas’ abortion ban makes narrow exceptions when the life of the mother is in danger but not for fetal anomalies. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that Cox had not shown that any of the complicati­ons in her pregnancy rose to the level of threatenin­g her life.

“Her health is on the line. She’s been in and out of the emergency room and she couldn’t wait any longer,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights, which was representi­ng Cox.

The organizati­on did not disclose where Cox went. On Monday, she would have been 20 weeks and six days pregnant.

Hours after Cox’s attorneys announced she had left Texas, the state Supreme Court issued its decision that ruled against Cox. It came three days after the court temporaril­y halted a lower judge’s ruling that gave Cox permission to get an abortion.

“No one disputes that Ms. Cox’s pregnancy has been extremely complicate­d. Any parents would be devastated to learn of their unborn child’s trisomy 18 diagnosis,” the court wrote. “Some difficulti­es in pregnancy, however, even serious ones, do not pose the heightened risks to the mother the exception encompasse­s.”

Cox, who lives in the Dallas area, was believed to be the first woman in the U.S. to ask a court for permission for an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year. Her lawsuit quickly became a high-profile test of bans in Texas and a dozen other GOP-controlled states, where abortion is prohibited at nearly all stages of pregnancy.

Days after Cox filed her lawsuit, a pregnant woman in Kentucky also asked a court to allow an abortion. There has been no ruling yet in that case.

In Texas, Paxton mounted an aggressive defense to try to prevent Cox from having an abortion. He sent three Houston hospitals letters warning of legal consequenc­es — both criminal and civil — if they allowed Cox’s physician to provide the procedure. He also argued that Cox had not demonstrat­ed that her life was at imminent risk, including noting that she was sent home after her multiple visits to emergency rooms.

Cox had cesarean surgeries during her first two pregnancie­s. Her lawsuit argued that inducing labor would carry a risk of a uterine rupture because of her prior C-sections, and that another one at full term would would endanger her ability to carry another child. But Paxton contended those arguments still fell short.

“Rather, the only question is whether Ms. Cox’s condition meets the exception, regardless of how long the child is expected to live,” Paxton’s office told the court in a filing over the weekend.

Doctors told Cox that her fetus has a condition known as trisomy 18, which is when a baby has an extra copy of chromosome 18. The diagnosis has a very high likelihood of miscarriag­e or stillbirth, and low survival rate. Doctors told Cox that inducing labor or carrying the baby to term could jeopardize her ability to have another child.

Trisomy 18 occurs in approximat­ely 1 in 2,500 diagnosed pregnancie­s, according to the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. There is no live birth in about 70% of pregnancie­s involving the diagnosis that proceed past 12 weeks gestationa­l age, according to a legal filing that the two groups submitted to the court.

 ?? ?? Cox
Cox

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States