Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Panel endorses $65.8 million to fund school projects

- MICHAEL R. WICKLINE

LITTLE ROCK — An Arkansas legislativ­e panel on Tuesday endorsed the state Department of Education’s request for $65.8 million in state restricted reserve funds for the state’s share of public school building constructi­on and major renovation projects.

In a voice vote with no audible dissenters, the Joint Budget Committee’s Performanc­e Evaluation and Expenditur­e Review Subcommitt­ee recommende­d the Joint Budget Committee approve the state Department of Education’s request.

Greg Rogers, chief financial officer for the state Department of Education, said in a letter dated March 8 to state Department of Finance and Administra­tion Secretary Jim Hudson that the department requested $65.8 million from the restricted reserve fund’s education facilities set-aside under Act 561 of 2023, Section 3 for the state Division of Elementary and Secondary Education Facilities Partnershi­p Program.

The program is a financial partnershi­p between the state and public school districts to share the cost of school facilities constructi­on and major renovation­s, he said.

Rogers said every two years school districts have the opportunit­y to apply for state financial participat­ion for projects that support their facilities master plan.

“This funding will allow the division to partner with multiple districts across the state and provide for new schools, additions to existing schools, conversion­s of existing space, and renovation­s such as replacemen­ts of roofs, HVAC, electrical, plumbing or structural system,” he wrote in his letter.

The Legislatur­e in 2023 authorized the transfer of $500 million of state surplus funds into the restricted reserve fund’s educationa­l facilities set-aside to provide the state’s share of public school building projects over five or six years, “so we don’t keep going into [the Revenue Stabilizat­ion Act]” for the funds, Rogers told state lawmakers on Tuesday in response to a question from state Sen. Missy Irvin, R-Mountain View.

The state’s Revenue Stabilizat­ion Act distribute­s state general revenue to state-supported programs such as public schools, the state’s higher education institutio­ns, human services and correction­al programs.

State Sen. Jimmy Hickey, R-Texarkana, said state general revenue funds previously were allocated for the state’s share of public school building projects in the state’s Revenue Stabilizat­ion Act for about a decade, “although it has been escalating up of course as most things would.”

In fiscal 2023 that ended June 30, 2023, $70.3 million in general revenue was allocated for the educationa­l facilities partnershi­p program.

After the money in the restricted reserve fund’s education facilities set-aside “is used, are you trying to say that we will no longer need that anymore or at that particular point we will have to go back for a line-item” in the state’s Revenue Stabilizat­ion Act if surplus funds are no longer available to replenish the program, Hickey asked Rogers.

In response, Rogers said he doesn’t believe the education partnershi­p program will end.

“I think that at the end of the fifth or sixth years once we extinguish the set-aside funds, it would be something that we would have to step back and look and see how much is needed, if it is another set-aside, or if it would be something that we would put in [the Revenue Stabilizat­ion Act],” he said.

The state Department of Education previously received approval to receive $83 million out of the restricted reserve fund’s education facilities setaside, according to a Bureau of Legislativ­e Research analyst. If the Joint Budget Committee approves the department’s request for $65.8 million, that would leave a balance of $351 million in the restricted reserve fund’s education facilities set-aside.

Sen. Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy, said he would encourage state officials to continue reevaluati­ng the educationa­l partnershi­p program “to ensure that this is something sustainabl­e for the state and that we are meeting the needs of the districts, but not exceeding the state participat­ion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States