Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

‘The Crisis of 2020’ was predicted back in 1991

- By Jeremy W. Peters The New York Times

They called it the Crisis of 2020 — an unspecifie­d calamity that “could rival the gravest trials our ancestors have known” and serve as “the next great hinge of history.” It could be an environmen­tal catastroph­e, a nuclear threat or “some catastroph­ic failure in the world economy.”

That was 1991.

The scholars responsibl­e were William Strauss and Neil Howe, whose book “Generation­s” introduced a provocativ­e theory that U.S. history unfolds in boom-tobust cycles of roughly 80 years. Their conclusion­s about the way each generation develops its own characteri­stics and leadership qualities influenced a wide range of political leaders, from liberals such as Bill Clinton and Al Gore to pro-Trump conservati­ves such as Newt Gingrich and Steve Bannon.

Seems as if they were on to something. So now what?

Strauss died in 2007, so he isn’t able to observe how eerily correct “The Crisis of 2020” was or offer any insight into how America might come out on the other end of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

But Howe, who now hosts a podcast and analyzes demographi­c trends for an investment advisory firm, is still in the insight business. And what he sees ahead — a generation­al realignmen­t in U.S. politics hastened by the failure of the baby boomer generation to lead the nation out of its quagmire — does not bode well for President Donald Trump or the Republican­s.

For most of the past 75 years, the Republican attitude about government has been rooted in a deep skepticism of authority that says, in essence: Success doesn’t take a village; it takes a determined individual whose government isn’t standing in the way. But that belief, Howe said, “is uniquely ill-suited to the current crisis.”

Nearly 30 years ago, when he first predicted an event such as the coronaviru­s, Howe said the year 2020 was not a mark-your-calendar prognostic­ation of doomsday but a round number that fit the cyclical nature of their theory: It is roughly 80 years after the last great crises of World War II and the Great Depression.

More insightful than the date itself was the assertion that historical patterns pointed toward the arrival of a generation-defining crisis that would force millennial­s into the fire early in their adulthood. (Strauss and

Howe were the first to apply that term to those born in the early 1980s because they would come of age about the year 2000.)

More than just a novelty, their theory helps explain why some of the most prominent voices calling for political reform from left, center and right have been young — Rep. Alexandria OcasioCort­ez, 30; former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg, 38; Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, 40.

And as baby boomers age out of public service, the theory says, fixing the problems created by the pandemic will fall to this younger, civically oriented generation. Howe, who at 68 is a member of the cohort he is critical of, said in an interview that it was no coincidenc­e that the boomer president and many people in his generation — especially the more conservati­ve ones — have generally taken a more lax attitude toward the coronaviru­s than younger people.

Polls have found that younger Americans overwhelmi­ngly favor a cautious approach to getting back to normal — and are more worried about the virus. This includes many young Republican­s, ages 18 to 49, who were far more likely than Republican­s 50 and older to say the worst of the outbreak is yet to come, according to a Pew Research Center poll last month.

“This is really the problem with Gen X and baby boomers,” Howe said. “They’ve championed this kind of individual­ism. They’ve championed thinking less about the community.”

Conservati­ves might argue they are best equipped to confront a moment that feels at times as if the apocalypse is at hand. Cable news, talk radio and rightwing websites have long been full of ads for products intended to sustain people through catastroph­e: investment­s in precious metals, home generators and supplies to can your own food.

Howe’s critique of today’s conservati­ves is shared by a growing number of younger Republican­s. Rachel Bovard, the senior director of policy at the Conservati­ve Partnershi­p Institute, said many in her generation wanted to see an interventi­onist government in areas of policy such as trade and finance.

“I think that’s gone unquestion­ed for so long, and it’s become this national theology: Private enterprise is good. Full stop,” Bovard, 36, said. “I prize my liberty, whether it’s liberty from a tyrannical government or a tyrannical corporatio­n.”

One upside to the crises at the heart of these theories is the innovation they tend to produce — an economic and social program such as the New Deal, or a public health discovery such as the vaccine for polio. But so far the Trump administra­tion has been incapable or unwilling to think big about the problems at hand, critics say.

This skepticism that bold solutions will come from the Trump administra­tion is shared even by Bannon, a fairly reliable defender of the president’s since he was pushed out of his role as White House chief strategist in August 2017. Bannon said the administra­tion never took seriously the possibilit­y that a catastroph­e such as the coronaviru­s could strike, which has led to a failure of imaginatio­n in dealing with the problem.

Bannon said that instead of coming up with new programs to deal with the millions of people who may never get their old jobs back, the White House and its conservati­ve allies were falling back on the kind of stimulus policies they purport to loathe.

Where were all the conservati­ve businessme­n who have insisted that the government get out of their way, Bannon asked? “I saw them all, once again, run to the government for bailouts,” he said.

If the pandemic doesn’t break the boomer generation’s grip on American government, some see hope that it will end the brand of conservati­sm that has thrived during their time in power.

“Where’s my copy of ‘Atlas Shrugged?’ ” Bannon asked, referring to the Ayn Rand novel that conservati­ves often cite for its heroic portrayal of individual­ism and self-determinat­ion. “It’s in the shredder.”

 ?? DEMETRIUS FREEMAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A long line forms for face mask distributi­on May 2 at Prospect Park in the New York City borough of Brooklyn.
DEMETRIUS FREEMAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES A long line forms for face mask distributi­on May 2 at Prospect Park in the New York City borough of Brooklyn.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States