Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

Seat families together, airlines

- By Ed Perkins eperkins@mind.net

Family groups flying together should not have to pay extra seat-selection fees to be assured of sitting together. That relatively simple and obvious propositio­n has neverthele­ss been ignored by airlines and the Department of Transporta­tion (DoT), so travelers have turned to Congress for relief. The new “Fly Together Act” proposal in the Senate parallels an earlier companion bill in the House. Both address an obvious consumer pain point.

Seating family groups together is especially important for families with children, under the age of 12 or so, who might need constant attention and supervisio­n. These families should remain together without having to pay $10 each or more to guarantee adjacent seats. On the other hand, this isn’t a rock-hard principle: I have no sympathy for adult couples who say their trip was “ruined” because they couldn’t sit together on a five-hour flight.

Family seating is often a benefit to other travelers, too. I know that if I had arranged an aisle or window seat assignment, I wouldn’t want to have the adjacent middle occupied by a small child who is isolated from his/her parents. But I also wouldn’t like to be shamed into moving to a middle seat to accommodat­e the family’s needs.

To be fair, airlines often try to fix obvious family seating problems on an ad hoc basis. During boarding, cabin attendants ask for volunteers to switch seats so as to accommodat­e families. And this often works — but it adds confusion and delays the boarding process.

This bill is yet another illustrati­on of how brazenly airlines refuse to acknowledg­e and address consumer pain points. Their approach follows a regular pattern:

■ Ignore pain points and obvious consumer abuses as long as possible.

■ When consumer resistance grows to be substantia­l, promise “we don’t need regulation; we can fix this on our own.”

■ Continue to ignore the problem.

■ When consumers, fed up with lack of action, turn to the Department of Transporta­tion for relief, oppose any DoT proposals to solve the problem.

■ If DoT does nothing, continue to ignore the problem.

■ When consumers, in desperatio­n turn to Congress for relief, lobby hard against any proposed legislativ­e solution.

■ If either DoT or Congress actually does impose a solution, kvetch about “excessive regulation.”

Also to be fair, solutions imposed by DoT or legislatio­n often result in unintended consequenc­es— sometimes, consequenc­es that airlines know and warn about. That’s why, to an outside observer, the airlines’ “ignore it and it will go away” strategy seems so counterpro­ductive. They also often counter with a claim that they do, in fact, offer options that overcome the complaint. But that claim channels Marie Antoinette: Those problemfre­e service products come at staggering fares that most families couldn’t begin to afford.

Regardless of how obvious the requiremen­t, the Fly Together Act faces an uncertain future. Given today’s political environmen­t and the urgent need to address more pressing matters, I’m doubtful that this bill will be voted on, much less passed, during the current situation.

And family seating isn’t the only rampant consumer abuse in the travel industry. Among others, I’d nominate deceptive hotel pricing as a top issue: The practice of so many hotels to carve out part of the true rate, omit it from initial rate postings and advertisem­ents, and add it back in later as a mandatory fee called a “resort” fee, a “facility” fee, and now even a “COVID-19 fee.” Some restaurant­s are playing similar games with menu prices.

Another important abuse is requiring air travelers to forfeit their normal rights to legal redress when they buy tickets. Many contracts of carriage specify that ticket buyers waive their rights to sue and airline in court and to participat­e in class action suits.

Immediate action on the Fly Together Act and other consumer protection legislatio­n is unlikely this year. But there’s an election in the offing. I don’t believe that family seating and other consumer abuses are partisan issues. So if you agree, press any House or Senate candidates of either party to promise support for the Fly Together Ace and other pro-consumer legislatio­n.

It’s obviously huge because to me, it’s a symbol of an accomplish­ment that you’ve worked really hard for. It definitely compares to Daytona in that manner as far as something that we worked really hard for, so people are recognizin­g that work that we’ve done, and especially director Greg Whitley’s team — they’re really the ones behind all of that hard work. It’s not the same nerves and craziness that you’re feeling in those two minutes, hoping that everyone hits their routine. But it’s definitely as thrilling, as far as recognitio­n.

You’re absolutely right, it’s like being thrown into the air. We were not prepared at all for the success of the show. I’ve been working on this for a long time, and because it is cheerleadi­ng, I didn’t think that there would be a huge audience as far as people outside of the cheer community. So I was just hopeful that our community and the cheer world would watch the show and appreciate it ... So we weren’t ready at all for basically the whole world to watch it.

... I think the good thing — it was good and it was bad — was the fact that it came out when we were about to get ready for competitio­n. It was a push because we weren’t expecting it. We had a lot of PR to do, a lot of interviews and stuff like that, so we were trying to balance our time appropriat­ely so that we didn’t get behind. But we were so focused on what we were working on, once we would go into practice, it felt like everything was just normal, as it’s always been every year. It didn’t feel like we had all these eyes on us and all this pressure on us, from people wanting to know what was going on and what we were doing. Definitely things were a little bit different. We had to have more security around, cover the windows in the gym because people were coming and filming — just some things that we kind of had to get used to. But honestly, the fact that we were pushing ourselves so hard for competitio­n and working a lot of hours, it really kept us in our bubble and kept us grounded and focused.

Absolutely. We are all in this together. We didn’t know what we were getting ourselves into. But there’s been so many blessings from it, especially for the kids with just different opportunit­ies, and I’ve seen their confidence grow . ... I haven’t really seen a lot of negativity. And thankfully, because I definitely would be pushing back and wrapping my arms around them, protecting them from that.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? Family seating isn’t the only rampant consumer abuse in the travel industry.
DREAMSTIME Family seating isn’t the only rampant consumer abuse in the travel industry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States