Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

IRS identifica­tion demands smack of Big Brother

- By Preston Brashers The Heritage Foundation

Surveys find 81 percent of U.S. adults support voter ID requiremen­ts. Yet President Joe Biden recently condemned state election integrity laws that strengthen voter ID protection­s and ensure the accuracy of voter registrati­on rolls as “Jim Crow 2.0.” This supposed “threat to our democracy” is so grave that Biden equated those who support them with overt racists like Bull Connor and George Wallace.

But if the president thinks checking IDs and verifying voter rolls is racist, how can he condone the new IRS procedures requiring taxpayers to give a private company a copy of their government-issued photo ID — as well as their email address, phone number, Social Security Number and a video selfie taken with a smartphone or computer — before they can gain access to basic tax services on the IRS website?

Is Biden’s IRS engaging in “Jim Crow 3.0?”

Actually, the IRS’ demands of taxpayers smack more of dangerous Big Brotherism than racism. For example, if ID.me, the Virginia-based company being entrusted with taxpayers’ private informatio­n, is unable to verify users’ identity with the informatio­n, users will then have to join a video call with a “trusted referee” to “answer a few questions.”

ID.me will use the video selfies, which all users must provide, to collect biometric data, including voiceprint­s and facial geometry recognitio­n. Taxpayers must sign a consent form for the company to collect this data, and the form allows ID.me to “reserve the right to change or modify this Biometric Consent.”

Many taxpayers won’t fully understand what informatio­n is being collected or how it will be used. How many people read all the consent forms they sign? Even if they do, taxpayers may have no choice but to consent if they need to access their online account, get their tax records, or update their child tax credit informatio­n.

Americans’ ability to interact with government for basic tax services will be filtered through a secret private algorithm. All told, the new system will determine taxpayers’ access to services that were used an estimated 60 million times last year. The IRS website also states that over the next year, additional IRS applicatio­ns will transition to the new system.

In other words, in the name of protecting taxpayer informatio­n, the IRS will compel even more taxpayers to give away extremely personal informatio­n to a private company.

The IRS has a poor track record of safeguardi­ng taxpayer informatio­n. In June 2021, ProPublica, a left-leaning news organizati­on that somehow received private tax documents, released a report leaking informatio­n on the tax records of dozens of the wealthiest taxpayers. Nobody has been held accountabl­e for the apparent felonious data leak or data breach.

Making a private company a gatekeeper to certain taxpayer informatio­n hardly guarantees such informatio­n is safe from future leaks or breaches. In 2017, the personal informatio­n of 147 million Americans was exposed when Equifax experience­d a data breach.

Also consider the difference between how state voting laws come about compared to the IRS’ new procedures.

States that enact voter ID requiremen­ts or change other election laws must do so through the standard legislativ­e process: elected representa­tives passing laws that are subject to all the legal checks and balances.

Yet Biden’s IRS will require taxpayer data to access basic tax functions with no new laws passed and no elected officials accountabl­e for the change.

Which is more undemocrat­ic?

The Biden IRS has consistent­ly sought more power. Last fall, the Treasury Department pushed to allow the IRS to track the bank transactio­ns of virtually all Americans, but the effort stalled when it was met with public outcry.

In the case of the new facial recognitio­n requiremen­ts, though, the IRS is acting outside the legislativ­e process, flexing its own power by imposing new informatio­n-sharing requiremen­ts on taxpayers.

When agencies like the IRS exert the power to trample on taxpayer privacy, it exposes the ever-increasing power of the executive branch, a flaw in the functionin­g of our democratic republic. In Biden’s words, “That’s the kind of power you see in totalitari­an states, not in democracie­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States