Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

Be careful what you wish for in quarterbac­k search

- By John Romano Tampa Bay Times

TAMPA — Put down the tape measure, and step away from the quarterbac­k.

This manhunt for Tom Brady’s replacemen­t in Tampa Bay needs to pump the brakes. Yes, the Bucs need a new quarterbac­k and, yes, fantasy shopping is one of the true joys of the offseason.

But before you begin breaking down film and arguing on social media, there are some serious questions that need to be sorted out. The kind of questions with ramificati­ons that last beyond the 2022 calendar.

We’re all fascinated by the idea that the Bucs and L.A. Rams won consecutiv­e Super Bowls by bringing in Pro Bowl quarterbac­ks, and there’s a natural temptation to begin looking for the next mercenary champion.

But this isn’t a one-ingredient recipe. Just because you make a trade or a big free-agent splash does not guarantee a thing. Ask the Jacksonvil­le Jaguars about Nick Foles. Or the Minnesota Vikings about Kirk Cousins. Or the Indianapol­is Colts about Carson Wentz. Or, if you want to bring up bad memories, the Bucs about Chris Chandler.

It’s admirable to search for the best quarterbac­k you can find, but it’s also important to be realistic about a team’s likelihood to contend. About future draft picks and salary caps. About timing and fit.

To be blunt, this is not two years ago. This is not Tom Brady, Part Deux.

The landscape was different for the Bucs in 2020. First of all, Brady was a free agent. He wasn’t going to cost draft picks. He wasn’t going to cost anything other than a sizable chunk of Glazer money.

And, this time, there are no six-time Super Bowl winners sitting in the free-agent aisle. The best free-agent quarterbac­k available, according to Pro Football Focus, is Jameis Winston. And y’all lost your damn minds when I suggested a few weeks ago that he might be worth considerin­g.

Also, the salary cap was not so snug in Tampa Bay back in 2020. In fact, the Bucs had about $80 million to play with before signing Brady, which gave them more flexibilit­y than almost any team in the league.

Finally, the Bucs were a younger team in 2020. They weren’t potentiall­y going into the season with four defensive starters (Ndamukong Suh, Lavonte David, Jason Pierre-Paul and William Gholston) at 31 and older.

This doesn’t mean the Bucs can’t be contenders in 2022, but the margin for error is narrower. It will likely take draft picks and it will likely mean borrowing against future salary caps to find a quarterbac­k. So it will likely not work as smoothly or effectivel­y as Brady’s arrival in 2020.

(And, please, do not shout that Kyle Trask is the answer. Maybe, down the road, he will be. But he’s never taken a snap in the NFL, and Bruce Arians is not likely to spend his 70th birthday grooming a quarterbac­k for someone else to enjoy a few years later.)

So where does this leave the Bucs in 2022?

Personally, I would suggest sticking with the dollar slots rather than going all-in at the poker table.

 ?? PHELAN M. EBENHACK/AP ?? The Colts gave up 1st- and 3rd-round picks for Carson Wentz just a year ago, but they appear to already have soured on him.
PHELAN M. EBENHACK/AP The Colts gave up 1st- and 3rd-round picks for Carson Wentz just a year ago, but they appear to already have soured on him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States