Orlando Sentinel

Van Gogh’s death, told through stunning images

- By Rick Bentley

Dorota Kobiela has a deep passion for filmmaking and the works of Vincent van Gogh. She’s brought those two loves together to create “Loving Vincent,” the most visually stimulatin­g feature film to be released in years.

The film is the result of what can happen when a director is inspired to look beyond the celluloid canvas to tell her story. To achieve this, Kobiela used a selection of van Gogh paintings as the basis of the visuals for the production, and through the work of hundreds of painters she created 65,000 handpainte­d frames of film that wove seamlessly the moments from one van Gogh work to another. In the world of animation, van Gogh would be the film illustrato­r and the other artists the go-betweeners.

Each brushstrok­e by the army of artists is used to tell the story of what happened after van Gogh’s death in 1890. The script is based on letters written by the artist and his brother, Theo, along with other documentat­ion from that time. In the summer of 1891, Armand Roulin (Douglas Booth) is given a letter from Vincent by his father, Postman Joseph Roulin (Chris O’Dowd), to hand-deliver to Vincent’s brother. During his trek, Armand begins to get a clearer picture of van Gogh. And the more Armand learns, the more he begins to question the reports that van Gogh committed suicide.

All of the characters are brought to life by a cast filmed in a green-screen environmen­t. This allowed each painter to give the scene a look taken from one of van Gogh’s works while still maintainin­g the integrity of the performanc­e. Those familiar with van Gogh’s work will be able to spot which paintings inspired which characters. Even the actors are painted into the scenes to make them look as if they come from van Gogh’s world.

And there were plenty of works by the Dutch painter to use; in just over a decade, he created approximat­ely 2,100 artworks, including 860 oil paintings. His most famous works include “The Starry Night” and “Sunflowers.”

That connection to van Gogh’s work is a plus for the film’s cinematogr­aphy but is counterpro­ductive to the work of the actors. The performanc­es by strong actors like O’Dowd, Saoirse Ronan and Booth are lost because each frame of film is such a masterwork that it overpowers even the best performanc­e.

But “Loving Vincent” is a movie that shuns the convention­al and embraces the original with a deadly grip. Because it was put together in an unconventi­onal manner, it requires the audience to reset its own calibratio­n in regard to watching the film so that there’s more of a willingnes­s to accept this brave presentati­on. Although the script is a little disjointed, it’s the visuals that make this film work. You could watch “Loving Vincent” without the sound and still be entertaine­d by the visual spectacle.

Through Kobiela’s loving guidance, the essence of each van Gogh is protected even when some modificati­ons had to be made. Kobiela would often pan through the painting or in some cases create areas outside the canvas to stretch the painting to fit a movie screen.

There is a stunning flow to each scene as the artist took van Gogh’s unique use of color, shape and texture and transforme­d it into a moving world. Water dances in those comma-like shapes and swirls that are almost a signature to a van Gogh painting, while background­s explode with very distinct hues.

There have been plenty of movies over the years that have had cinematogr­aphy so beautiful that each frame looks like a piece of art. “Loving Vincent” takes that one step further, as each frame is a piece of art that brings a new kind of motion to the artist’s work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States