Orlando Sentinel

Trump dials down emergency call

As shutdown drags on, he waffles on move that even allies wary of

- By John Wagner, Erica Werner and Josh Dawsey

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday threw cold water on the idea of immediatel­y declaring a national emerfast.” gency to build a wall on the U.S.Mexico border, reversing days of signals that he might soon declare the emergency amid a protracted standoff with Democrats over a partial shutdown of the federal government.

“What we’re not looking to do right now is national emergency,” he said Friday afternoon, surrounded by law enforcemen­t officials at a White House roundtable. “I’m not going to do it so The president has said for days he might declare a national emergency to expedite constructi­on of the wall — and his administra­tion has asked agencies to begin preparatio­ns.

But he has gotten sharp pushback, even from Republican­s, at the notion of declaring such an emergency. His lawyers have pri-

vately warned that he could be on shaky footing with such a move, according to people familiar with the discussion­s.

The House broke for the weekend Friday, ensuring that the partial government shutdown would become the longest in U.S. history.

The Democratic-led House held its final votes of the week Friday, including on a measure to ensure that furloughed federal workers receive back pay when the government reopens.

The bill, which was approved 411-7 and passed the Senate on Thursday, now goes to Trump for his signature. All those who opposed it were Republican­s.

The House also passed another bill that would reopen more shuttered government department­s — but it was already declared dead on arrival in the GOP-controlled Senate because of a veto threat from Trump.

The bill passed 240-179, with 10 Republican­s joining all Democrats in the chamber supporting it.

About 800,000 workers missed a paycheck Friday as the impasse between Trump and Democrats stretched into its 21st day.

On Friday, there were no signs of serious negotiatio­ns, and leaders of both chambers announced no plans to meet before Monday.

With polls showing Trump getting most of the blame for the shutdown, the administra­tion accelerate­d planning to try to get around Congress and fund the wall from existing sources of federal revenue.

The White House explored diverting money for wall constructi­on from a range of other accounts. One idea considered was diverting some of the $13.9 billion allocated to the Army Corps of Engineers after last year’s deadly hurricanes and floods.

That option triggered an uproar in Puerto Rico, which is still rebuilding, and appeared to lose steam Friday.

Other possibilit­ies included tapping asset forfeiture funds, including money seized by the Department of Justice from drug kingpins, according to a congressio­nal Republican not authorized to speak publicly about private conversati­ons.

The White House also was eyeing military constructi­on funds, another politicall­y difficult choice because the money would be diverted from a backlog of hundreds of projects at bases around the U.S.

Despite Trump’s go-slow message, momentum grew in some corners for some sort of emergency declaratio­n. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who met with the president on Friday, took to Twitter afterward to urge: “Mr. President, Declare a national emergency NOW. Build a wall NOW.”

But the notion of declaring a national emergency to bypass Congress has divided Republican­s, some of whom see it as an encroachme­nt on congressio­nal authority.

“I think the president should not do it,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told reporters Friday. “I think as a member of Congress I ought to be very selfish about the constituti­onal powers that we have to appropriat­e money. I think it might be a bad precedent.”

Trump has told advisers he believes the fight for the wall — even if it never yields the requested funding — is a political win for him.

But some of his outside advisers have urged him to declare a national emergency, believing it would have two benefits: First, it would allow him to claim that he was the one to act to reopen the government.

Second, inevitable legal challenges would send the matter to court, allowing Trump to continue the fight for the wall — and excite his supporters — while not closing the government or requiring him to start constructi­on.

Many Democrats say they have little reason to give into Trump’s demand for border wall funding since winning the House in the midterm elections.

“The American people gave us the majority based on our comprehens­ive approach to this problem and they rejected President Trump’s,” said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla.

While the emergency declaratio­n has been floated as way to end the standoff between Trump and congressio­nal Democrats, Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C, who speaks frequently with the president, said such a move would not necessaril­y end the partial shutdown.

“They’re two separate things, and I can tell you that everybody who thinks the national emergency declaratio­n would actually end the shutdown, those two don’t necessaril­y go hand in hand,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States