Orlando Sentinel

Eventually, Paris withdrawal will overshadow impeachmen­t

- By Joel A. Mintz

Given the current state of affairs, it’s tempting to imagine that historians will regard Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t as the most significan­t event of his presidency.

However, nearly three years into his presidency, the president’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, unmistakab­ly committing the United States to the wrong side of the world’s effort to combat the climate crisis, is the most consequent­ial and — in the long term — it’s likely to be the most lasting and harmful action of his presidency.

Though it has taken a good long while for many to accept a fairly longstandi­ng scientific consensus, it is now beyond serious dispute that the continuing warming of our planet is a direct result of human activity.

Climate change is under way, and it has already resulted in melting glaciers and ice sheets, sea level rise in coastal areas, prolonged summer heat waves, floods, droughts, exceptiona­lly intense hurricanes, massive wildfires and ocean acidificat­ion.

These conditions are all expected to worsen as global levels of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases continue to rise — with devastatin­g consequenc­es for human beings and a plethora of other species.

Sadly, rather than asserting bold leadership in the face of this deepening global crisis, Trump continues to deny the relationsh­ip between climate disruption and human activities, burying his head in the sand even as rising seas engulf the beach.

His administra­tion’s formal notice to the United Nations that the United States intends to become the only nation to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Accords is particular­ly dangerous and irresponsi­ble.

While imperfect because it does not go as far as it should have, the Agreement, signed by more than 220 countries, represents a crucial beginning of a cooperativ­e internatio­nal framework for tackling climate change.

Without active U.S. leadership, however, the prospects for improving the effectiven­ess of the Paris Agreement are dim.

In fact, during the Trump presidency, U.S. abdication of what was once a leadership role on climate change has all but invited other nations to follow suit. And they have. Very few have shown any willingnes­s to toughen their emissions targets, and some have simply refused to meet the ones they’ve already set.

Only the United States, the world’s largest economy, has the diplomatic clout to successful­ly reverse these destructiv­e trends.

The Trump administra­tion has made no such effort. Indeed, it has rolled back a series of Obama-era measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, determined, apparently, to seal the fate of the only planet we have.

As it happens, the Trump administra­tion’s notice to the United Nations allows the United States to pull out of the Paris Agreement once and for all exactly one day after the 2020 election.

If the president follows through, the damage will be severe. If he’s reelected, he’ll undoubtedl­y continue along his current course. If he’s defeated and still withdraws, reentry to the global pact will be slow and laden with obstacles.

In the meantime, the United States would be relegated to the status of an “observer” in future climate negotiatio­ns, and suspicion of the reliabilit­y and seriousnes­s of purpose of our nation may be expected to persist.

In the balance hang disastrous consequenc­es — in the form of lives lost to extreme heat, intense storms, new diseases, immense economic disruption­s, food shortages, enormous human displaceme­nt, extensive cross-border population migrations, and the extinction of millions of species of animals and plants.

The time to avoid these collective woes is limited and fleeting, and what is at stake simply could not be more vital.

So, while impeachmen­t rises to the fore when examining the Trump record from the perspectiv­e of his third year in office, it’s likely that his most significan­t legacy will be related to climate change — his refusal to acknowledg­e it, his failure to do anything about it, and his ongoing effort to sabotage global efforts to prevent or slow its effects.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States