With Flynn case, Trump aims to rewrite narrative
Move to dismiss is part of push to recast Russia probe
WASHINGTON — When Michael Flynn was forced from the White House, Vice President Mike Pence said he was disappointed the national security adviser had misled him about his talks with the Russian ambassador. President Donald Trump called the deception unacceptable.
Now Pence says he’d be happy to see Flynn back in the administration, calling him a “patriot,” as Trump pronounces him exonerated.
What a difference three years makes. The Justice Department’s move to dismiss the criminal case against Flynn marks another step in his transformation, in the eyes of Trump and his allies, from rogue adviser to victim of runaway law enforcement.
The dismissal rewrites the narrative of the case that Trump’s own Justice Department had advanced for the last three years in a way that former law enforcement officials say downplays the legitimate national security concerns they believe Flynn posed and the consequences of the lies he pleaded guilty to telling. It’s been swept up in a broader push by Trump and his Republican allies to reframe the Russia investigation as a “deep state” plot to sabotage his administration.
“His goal is that by the end of this, you’re just not really sure what happened and at some gut level enough Americans say, ‘It’s kind of messy,’ ” said Princeton University historian Julian Zelizer.
Scrambling to manage the coronavirus and economic crash, Trump has been eager to shift the focus elsewhere. He has repeatedly called Flynn “exonerated” and pushed the development as evidence of what he deemed “Obamagate,” an allegation the previous administration tried to undermine him during the presidential transition.
Trump used the first 20 minutes of a recent Fox News interview to attack the Obama administration rather than offer updates on the pandemic.
An investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller found Russians interfered in the 2016 election on Trump’s behalf, though it did not allege illegal coordination with Trump’s campaign. Mueller examined multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice and pointedly noted he was unable to exonerate Trump.
But advisers believe painting the previous administration as corrupt is an effective line of attack against Trump’s presumptive Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, who was Barack Obama’s vice president, according to four current and former administration officials and Republicans close to the White House not authorized to discuss the matter by name.
Republicans have generated a “thick fog of propaganda,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md. “Trump and his enablers in Congress have a strategy of never admitting anything and always going on the attack.”
Attorney General William Barr has said dropping the case against Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, was in the interests of justice. The department says the FBI had insufficient grounds for interviewing Flynn about his “entirely appropriate” calls and that any imperfect statements he made weren’t material to the broader counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.
But the decision stunned former law enforcement officials involved in the case.
Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said the agency was obligated to interview Flynn about the Russian ambassador over sanctions imposed for election interference.
And because White House officials, including Pence, were inaccurately asserting that Flynn had never discussed sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, U.S. officials were concerned Flynn could be vulnerable to blackmail since Russia also knew what was discussed.
“Mr. Flynn was set to become the national security adviser, and it was untenable that Russia — which the intelligence community had just assessed had sought to interfere in the U.S. presidential election — might have leverage over him,” Mary McCord, the Justice Department’s
top national security official at the time, wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in which she accused Barr of misrepresenting her viewpoints.
She acknowledged an internal quarrel over whether to disclose details of Flynn’s calls to the White House and about the FBI’s move to interview Flynn without coordinating with Justice Department leadership. But she said there was broad agreement that Flynn was a potential counterintelligence threat.
A judge has yet to rule on the Justice Department’s dismissal request.