Orlando Sentinel

J&J talc phaseout may signal settling of suits

- By Jef Feeley and Riley Griffin

Johnson & Johnson’s decision to phase out the talc-based version of its iconic baby powder may signal the company is moving out of litigation-defense mode over allegation­s the product causes cancer and preparing for a global settlement of almost 20,000 pending claims.

The move, characteri­zed by J&J officials Tuesday as a “commercial decision,” allows the world’s largest maker of health care products to create a deadline for future claims that the powder causes ovarian cancer and mesothelio­ma, legal experts say.

“This fences the litigation pretty neatly,” said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond professor who teaches about product liability law. “It sets a date that says after this, the claims won’t fly because everyone is on notice about the talc allegation­s.”

J&J may be weary after six years of litigation with people who claim asbestos in its talc — or the mineral itself — caused cancer. Plaintiffs say the company knew of the cancer risks by the early 1970s and failed to warn consumers. A California jury asked in 2018 whether it could force J&J to put a warning on the product.

“This decision has no impact on our legal position,” said Kim Montagnino, a J&J spokeswoma­n. “We are confident in our legal strategy and our defense, which is supported by decades of scientific evidence showing our talc is safe.”

In some of those trials, juries across the U.S. have hit the company with billions of dollars in damages to compensate injured consumers and punish the company over its handling of the product. J&J has succeeded in getting most of those verdicts reduced or wiped out on appeal.

The company is still appealing a St. Louis jury’s $4.7 billion verdict. Jurors found the talc-based baby powder tainted by asbestos caused ovarian cancers in 22 women who sued.

J&J’s cornstarch-based baby powder, which has been on the market since 1980, will continue to be available in the U.S. and Canada.

Johnson’s Baby Powder currently accounts for less than 1% of the company’s U.S. consumer-health revenue, according to Kathleen Widmer, chairman of the company’s North America consumer unit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States