Orlando Sentinel

Fighting sunshine: Florida’s failure in the energy market

-

Gov. Ron DeSantis’ veto was needed to kill HB 741, a massive assault on individual liberty and the free market that sailed through the Florida Legislatur­e at the behest of the state’s largest monopoly utility, Florida Power & Light.

The bill, actually written by an FPL lobbyist, sought to prevent Floridians from using rooftop solar to become more energy independen­t.

It would have denied solar customers fair market value for the excess electricit­y they send back to the grid and allowed utilities to impose a host of punitive fees on those customers.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, HB 741 included a huge subsidy that would guarantee FPL profits by letting it and other utilities raise customer electric bills to make up for any revenue lost to competitio­n from rooftop solar.

While the governor’s veto stymied this brazen FPL power grab, at least for now, HB 741 was the product of a broken system that has Florida swimming upstream in today’s energy market.

In what should be great news for the Sunshine State, the energy market now favors solar power over natural gas and coal.

Old assumption­s about which sources of energy are the cheapest and most reliable no longer hold due to advances in solar and battery storage technology.

For example, power from solar projects is selling for between $15 and $25 per megawatt hour (MWh) — a price guaranteed for 20 years via power purchase agreements.

Prior to the recent spike in natural gas prices, electricit­y produced by gas generation was selling for between $45 and $65 per MWh. Therefore, the more a utility relies on natural gas for its power generation, the higher your electric bill will be.

FPL, for example, generates 78% of its power from natural gas. The Tampa Electric and Duke numbers are similar.

This is why other sunny states such as Nevada, New Mexico and Utah are aggressive­ly shifting their electricit­y production to solar. But the same shift is also happening in decidedly less-sunny states such as Vermont.

Where is Florida in the solar sweepstake­s? It’s way back in the pack. The Sunshine State now gets a mere 4% of its electricit­y from solar.

Florida has more sunshine to take advantage of than any state east of the Mississipp­i River and is better positioned to reap solar’s incumbent economic benefits.

Why is this state so far behind? Because years ago Florida’s big three monopoly utilities chose to go all in on natural gas generation and are intent on squeezing every last penny of profit out of those gas-fired generating plants — even when doing so takes a big bite out of their customers’ wallets.

FPL, Duke and TECO, as monopolies with captive customer bases, are not subject to free-market competitio­n. They are also allowed by the Public Service Commission to pass fuel cost increases directly to their customers.

Thus, there is no incentive for them to diversify with solar or other cheaper sources of energy.

Making matters worse is the political power these monopolies wield in Tallahasse­e. From the state legislatur­e to the PSC, too many Florida policymake­rs are more committed to protecting power company interests than to looking out for regular Floridians.

The result is subsidy laden anti-liberty, anti-competitio­n legislatio­n like HB 741, ever-rising electric bills and a Sunshine State with a decidedly cloudy future.

David Jenkins is president of Conservati­ves for Responsibl­e Stewardshi­p, a national organizati­on with 10,000 members in Florida.

“The Invading Sea” is the opinion arm of the Florida Climate Reporting Network, a collaborat­ive of news organizati­ons across the state focusing on the threats posed by the warming climate.

 ?? ??
 ?? By David Jenkins ??
By David Jenkins

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States