Orlando Sentinel

Doctors weigh odds on abortion exceptions

Hesitation risky for pregnant women with complicati­ons

- By J. David Goodman and Azeen Ghorayshi

HOUSTON — Dr. Amanda Horton, an obstetrici­an who specialize­s in high-risk pregnancie­s, had been counseling pregnant patients at a small hospital in rural Texas last month when a woman arrived in crisis: It was only 17 weeks into her pregnancy, and her water had broken.

The fetus would not be viable outside the womb, and without the protection of the amniotic sac, the woman was vulnerable to an infection that could threaten her life. In Colorado or Illinois, states where Horton also practices and where abortion is generally legal, there would have been an option to end her pregnancy.

Texas has a ban on most abortions, providing an exception when a woman’s life is threatened. But the patient’s life in this case was not in immediate danger — yet. The hospital sent her home to wait for signs of infection or labor, Horton said.

Worried and with nowhere else to turn, the woman instead traveled hundreds of miles to New Mexico for an abortion.

Her patient, Horton said, made a choice “for her life.”

Each of the 13 states with bans on abortions allows for some exemption to save the life of the woman or to address a serious risk of “substantia­l and irreversib­le impairment of a major bodily function.”

But making that determinat­ion has become fraught with uncertaint­y and legal risk, doctors in several states said, with many adding that they have already been forced to significan­tly alter the care they provide to women whose pregnancy complicati­ons put them at high risk of harm.

Last week, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administra­tion over federal guidelines that required doctors to perform an abortion, even in states with abortion bans, if they determined it was necessary to treat dangerous pregnancy complicati­ons.

Amid the legal wrangling, hospitals have struggled with where and how to draw the line. Some have enlisted special panels of doctors and lawyers to decide when a pregnancy can be prematurel­y ended. Others have required multiple doctors to sign off on any such decision and document in detail why an abortion was necessary.

The result has delayed treatment and heightened risk, doctors said.

“It’s like you bring lots of people to the top of a high-rise and push them to the edge and then catch them before they fall,” said Dr. Alireza Shamshirsa­z, an obstetrici­an and fetal surgeon who practiced in

Houston until last month. “It’s a very dangerous way of practicing. All of us know some of them will die.”

The impact in these cases is on women who want to have children, only to encounter complicati­ons during pregnancy. The option to terminate the pregnancy has long been part of the standard care offered by doctors in situations where there is a risk of harm — or even death — to the mother.

The effect has been most visible in Texas, which passed a law prohibitin­g most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy last September.

A new study of two hospitals in Dallas County found that after the Texas law went into effect, pregnant women facing serious complicati­ons before fetal viability — mostly because their water broke prematurel­y — suffered because they were not allowed to end their pregnancie­s.

Out of 28 women who met the criteria for the study, more than half experience­d “significan­t” medical problems, including infections and hemorrhagi­ng, in the face of state-mandated limits on treatment, the study found. One woman required a hysterecto­my. And the rate of maternal health problems was far higher than the rate in other states where patients were offered the option to end their pregnancie­s, according to the study.

“You nearly doubled the complicati­on rate for the mother,” said Dr. Judy Levison, a Houston obstetrici­an, referring to the study, which she was not involved in. She added that all but one of the pregnancie­s ended with the death of the fetus.

“So why did they put them through that?” she said of the women.

This month, the Texas Medical Associatio­n sent a letter to state regulators asking them to step in after the associatio­n received

complaints from doctors that hospitals were preventing them from providing abortions when medically necessary to women because of fear of running afoul of the law, The Dallas Morning News reported.

In Missouri, an abortion ban went into effect in June with an exception for medical emergencie­s that required immediate abortions to avoid death or injury. The word “immediate” is being pored over by hospital administra­tions across the state, with questions about whether it refers to an imminent danger of death or an urgent threat to a woman’s health.

Some hospitals, as in Texas, have considered internal review panels to approve medically necessary abortions to reduce their legal liability. Others are requiring that multiple doctors sign off.

“All the physicians are complainin­g, but no one wants to speak up because of the possible consequenc­es; we can be fired,” said Shamshirsa­z, the Houston surgeon.

He described a colleague who had a patient with twins. At 15 weeks, she delivered one stillborn and asked to abort the other because of the risk of infection. Her case went before the hospital’s committee, but the abortion was denied because the fetus still had a heartbeat.

“We sent the patient home against her will,” he said.

The woman returned to the hospital about two weeks later feeling sick. Her pregnancy was terminated out of concern for her health, Shamshirsa­z said, but she had to be admitted to the intensive care unit for sepsis and acute kidney injury — both life-threatenin­g conditions.

“We have to wait until the mom comes with those symptoms,” he said.

All pregnancie­s come with risks to the health and life of the woman. Researcher­s have found the risk of complicati­ons and death are higher for pregnancy than for abortion.

Miscarriag­es occur in 15% of all pregnancie­s and may require a procedure — also used in some abortions — to remove the fetus. Preeclamps­ia, or pregnancy-induced high blood pressure, occurs in 5%-8% of all pregnancie­s and can be deadly. There is a 2% chance a pregnancy can be ectopic, meaning the fertilized egg has implanted outside of the uterus, making the pregnancy nonviable and threatenin­g the life of the woman.

But in the new legal landscape, no one is certain how serious those conditions must get before they justify an abortion under the law.

“It’s all odds,” said Dr. Charles Brown, the Texas district chair of the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts. “How high a percentage does it need to take before you get everyone to agree this woman’s life is in danger?”

 ?? LIZ MOSKOWITZ/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Each of the 13 states with bans on abortion allows some exemption to save the life of the woman, but making that determinat­ion has become fraught with uncertaint­y and legal risk, doctors in several states say.
LIZ MOSKOWITZ/THE NEW YORK TIMES Each of the 13 states with bans on abortion allows some exemption to save the life of the woman, but making that determinat­ion has become fraught with uncertaint­y and legal risk, doctors in several states say.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States