Orlando Sentinel

Critical thinking vs. indoctrina­tion is at the heart of political debate

- Tricia Foster is an English faculty member at Miami Dade College. She has been teaching freshman compositio­n for 10 years with a focus on rhetoric and critical thinking. She also serves as an Editorial Associate at KGL Editorial.

Most of us assume we are critical thinkers. After all, we often disagree with other people.

But being “critical” (expressing adverse comments) is vastly different from the act of “critical thinking” (the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment).

And it’s critical thinking that can counterman­d the rising tide of indoctrina­tion we’re increasing­ly being subjected to by the political extremes of a polarized nation.

Critical thinking is not a natural ability. In fact, it’s a skill learned through training and experience. So, what exactly is critical thinking and why is it important?

There has been a barrage of legislatio­n to curb the influence of indoctrina­tion by the left. However, the right is not blameless. It draws its power through religious indoctrina­tion. This is the foundation of the “culture wars” that threaten the sanctity of our American democracy. Although the term “culture wars” was popularize­d in 1991 by Professor LaBrosse-Levinson, it can be traced back to the German word “Kulturkamp­f,” or cultural struggle. But, is legislatio­n the best way to combat indoctrina­tion when that legislatio­n is rooted in indoctrina­tion itself ?

As Professor David Copp pointed out in his 2016 article “Moral Education Versus Indoctrina­tion” the term indoctrina­tion can be defined as “the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritical­ly.” The key to successful indoctrina­tion is uncritical acceptance.

In 1987, Professor Stephen Brookfield, of Columbia and Harvard Universiti­es, presented the four components of critical thinking in his book Developing Critical Thinkers. These four components include 1) identifyin­g and challengin­g assumption­s, not only in others, but also in yourself; 2) challengin­g context, the circumstan­ces that form an event, statement, or idea; 3) being able to imagine alternativ­es, acknowledg­ing that there is more than one right answer; and 4) questionin­g what we hold to be universal truths. Note that these components do not include a dismissive attitude. Quite the opposite. With critical thinking, the objective is to seek first to understand all possible perspectiv­es and their merits.

On the other hand, indoctrina­tion seeks to suppress other points of view so that the preferred point of view will go unchalleng­ed. Critical thinking encourages community inquiry and discourse while indoctrina­tion insists on the acceptance of hierarchic­al proclamati­ons and the imposition of “correct” ideas onto others.

Many people also believe they are critical thinkers because they “do their own research.” However, what is commonly called research these days is actually little more than a Google search. Google has its place in gathering informatio­n and learning skills, but it also promotes a backwards approach to actual research. Many people take a position, and then search for supporting evidence. However, real research doesn’t start with a position. It starts with a question, such as “What is the impact of gender-affirming care?” Then we read all of the possible perspectiv­es on the topic before forming an opinion. If you come to the topic with an opinion that has already been formed, you are not conducting research. You are engaging in confirmati­on bias, consciousl­y or unconsciou­sly looking for informatio­n that will confirm your world view and discredit the opposition.

Just because someone is powerful or popular does not mean they have appropriat­e credibilit­y to speak on an issue or the authority to make decisions that impact entire communitie­s. Just because someone claims to be aligned with elements of your own identity (religion, political party, core values), it does not mean their perspectiv­es should be repeated as “universal truths.” We must go behind the claims and find the evidence used to support those claims. We must examine the quality of that evidence using the four components of critical thinking. If we are not willing to do that, we are not critical thinkers. If we are not allowed to do that, we are being indoctrina­ted.

 ?? By Tricia Foster ??
By Tricia Foster

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States