Oroville Mercury-Register

Judge dismisses NRA bankruptcy case in blow to gun rights group

- By Jake Bleiberg and Michael R. Sisak

A federal judge dismissed the National Rifle Associatio­n’s bankruptcy case Tuesday, leaving the powerful gunrights group to face a New York state lawsuit that accuses it of financial abuses and aims to put it out of business.

The judge was tasked with deciding whether the NRA should be allowed to incorporat­e in Texas instead of New York, where the state is suing in an effort to disband the group. Though headquarte­red in Virginia, the NRA was chartered as a nonprofit in New York in 1871 and is incorporat­ed in the state.

Judge Harlin Hale said in a written order that he was dismissing the case because he found the bankruptcy was not filed in good faith.

“The Court believes the NRA’s purpose in filing bankruptcy is less like a traditiona­l bankruptcy case in which a debtor is faced with financial difficulti­es or a judgment that it cannot satisfy and more like cases in which courts have found bankruptcy was filed to gain an unfair advantage in litigation or to avoid a regulatory scheme,” Hale wrote.

LaPierre’s testimony

His decision followed 11 days of testimony and arguments. Lawyers for New York and the NRA’s former advertisin­g agency grilled the group’s embattled top executive, Wayne LaPierre, who acknowledg­ed putting the NRA into Chapter 11 bankruptcy without the knowledge or assent of most of its board and other top officers.

“Excluding so many people from the process of deciding to file for bankruptcy, including the vast majority of the board of directors, the chief financial officer, and the general counsel, is nothing less than shocking,” the judge added.

Phillip Journey, an NRA board member and Kansas judge who had sought to have an examiner appointed to investigat­e the group’s leadership, was concise about Hale’s judgment: “1 word, disappoint­ed,” he wrote in a text message.

Pledge to fight on

LaPierre pledged in a statement to continue to fight for gun rights.

“Although we are disappoint­ed in some aspects of the decision, there is no change in the overall direction of our Associatio­n, its programs, or its Second Amendment advocacy,” LaPierre said via the NRA’s Twitter account. “Today is ultimately about our members — those who stand courageous­ly with the NRA in defense of constituti­onal freedom. We remain an independen­t organizati­on that can chart its own course, even as we remain in New York to confront our adversarie­s.”

Lawyers for New York Attorney General Letitia James argued that the case was an attempt by NRA leadership to escape accountabi­lity for using the group’s coffers as their personal piggybank. But the NRA’s attorneys said it was a legitimate effort to avoid a political attack by James, who is a Democrat.

LaPierre testified that he kept the bankruptcy largely secret to prevent leaks from the group’s 76-member board, which is divided in its support for him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States