Oroville Mercury-Register

County should consider water organizati­on

-

Butte County has terrible water problems — such as numerous wells going dry — while excessive amounts of nut and fruit farming help to exhaust water supplies. This situation makes the proposed transfer of vital decisionma­king to the Agricultur­al Groundwate­r Users of Butte County (AGUBC) suspect, since they would control county water. Indeed, AGUBC is working to form a new district, namely, the Tuscan Water District, which would further their corporate-leaning control. AGUBC is not a democratic organizati­on but one where members must pay more than $2,000 to join. Moreover, not anyone can become a member—only those who are invited can join. The members will be far more oriented to serving corporate interests that would benefit outside corporatio­ns instead of citizens and businesses within the Butte County.

What we really need is a broadly democratic organizati­on that is committed to the core principles of the Sustainabl­e Groundwate­r Management Act. Most citizens want to be assured that Groundwate­r Sustainabi­lity Projects are undertaken, successful­ly. This means getting special districts and local agencies involved in the planning and pursuit of projects benefiting our county, including our small farmers and other Butte County residents.

Butte County Water Commission­ers and the Board of Supervisor­s should consider forming an organizati­on that will be an independen­t watchdog that will regularly check our groundwate­r conditions and develop projects aiming to obtain sustainabl­e groundwate­r. This organizati­on would be organized to work democratic­ally with the management boards of our three water subbasins, unlike the proposed Tuscan Water District.

— Grace Marvin, Chico

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States