Oroville Mercury-Register

Post-Roe v. Wade, patients rely on prenatal testing as states toughen abortion laws

- By Laura Ungar and Amanda Seitz

WASHINGTON >> In Utah, more of Dr. Cara Heuser's maternal-fetal medicine patients are requesting early ultrasound­s, hoping to detect serious problems in time to choose whether to continue the pregnancy or have an abortion.

In North Carolina, more obstetrics patients of Dr. Clayton Alfonso and his colleagues are relying on early genetic screenings that don't provide a firm diagnosis.

The reason? New state abortion restrictio­ns mean the clock is ticking.

Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, many health care providers say an increasing number of patients are deciding the fate of their pregnancie­s based on whatever informatio­n they can gather before state bans kick in. But early ultrasound­s show far less about the condition of a fetus than later ones. And genetic screenings may be inaccurate.

When you find out your fetus has a serious problem, “you're in crisis mode,” said Sabrina Fletcher, a doula who has helped women in this predicamen­t. “You're not thinking about legal repercussi­ons and (state) cutoff dates, and yet we're forced to.”

About half of states ban abortion or restrict it after a certain point in pregnancy. In Utah, it's generally illegal after the 18-week mark; in North Carolina, after 12 weeks.

This leaves millions of women in roughly 14 states with no option to get followup diagnostic tests in time to feasibly have an abortion there if they wanted, a paper published last March in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology found. Even more states have abortion cutoffs too early for mid-pregnancy ultrasound­s.

“More people are trying to find these things out earlier to try to fit within the confines of laws that in my mind don't have a place in medical practice,” said Alfonso, an OB-GYN at Duke University.

Checking for prenatal problems

When done at the right time, doctors said prenatal testing can identify problems and help parents decide whether to continue a pregnancy or prepare for a baby's complex needs after delivery.

One of the most common tests is the 20-week ultrasound, sometimes called an “anatomy scan.” It checks on the fetal heart, brain, spine, limbs and other parts of the body, looking for signs of congenital problems. It can detect things like brain, spine and heart abnormalit­ies and signs of chromosoma­l problems such as Down syndrome. Followup

testing may be needed to make a diagnosis.

The type of ultrasound­s patients receive — and when in pregnancy they have one done — can vary depending on the risk level of the patient, as well as the equipment and policies each practice has. For example, some women may have a first-trimester ultrasound to estimate a due date or check for multiple fetuses. But it's not standard practice because it is too early to see many of the fetus' limbs and organs in detail, the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts says.

It's impossible to spot problems like serious heart defects much before midpregnan­cy because the fetus is so small, Heuser said. Nonetheles­s, she said, more patients are having ultrasound­s at 10 to 13 weeks to get access to abortion if needed.

Experts say there are no statistics on exactly how many people opt for early ultrasound­s or make choices based on them. But some health care providers say they've noticed an uptick in requests for the scans, including Missouri genetic counselor Chelsea Wagner. She counsels patients from around the nation through telehealth, frequently discussing the results of ultrasound­s and genetic tests.

Wagner said these early ultrasound­s can't provide the assurance patients are looking for because “you can't give somebody an `everything looks good' or a clean bill of health off of an ultrasound at 10 weeks.”

Doctors also can't make a firm diagnosis from a genetic screening, which is done at 10 weeks gestation or later.

These screenings, also called “non-invasive prenatal tests,” are designed to detect abnormalit­ies in fetal DNA by looking at small, free-floating fragments circulatin­g in a pregnant woman's blood.

They screen for chromosoma­l disorders such as trisomy 13 and 18, which often end in miscarriag­e or stillbirth, Down syndrome and extra or missing copies of sex chromosome­s.

The accuracy of these tests varies by disorder, but none is considered diagnostic.

Natera, one of only a handful of U.S. companies that makes such genetic tests, said in an email that prenatal test results are reported as either “high risk” or “low risk” and that patients should seek confirmato­ry testing if they get a “high risk” result.

Some may be pretty accurate, doctors said, but false positives are possible. In 2022, the Food and Drug Administra­tion issued a warning about the screenings, reminding patients and doctors that results need further confirmati­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States