PCWorld (USA)

Why California isn’t banning gaming PCS (yet)

The state isn’t banning them outright, but there are concerns.


Have you heard? California just banned gaming PCS! Yes, they took your job ( go.pcworld. com/tkjb), and now they’re taking your gaming PC too!!! (The abundance of exclamatio­n marks indicates the sense of outrage.)

Well, that’s what you’d think if you read a headline that screamed: “Several US States Are Banning Gaming PCS” ( go.pcworld. com/bnpc) or “High-end Gaming PCS Banned in Six US States after California Energy Bill Limits Sales on High Performanc­e PCS” ( go.pcworld.com/bn6s).

This all kicked off when Alienware put notices on its website ( go.pcworld.com/alnt) of certain model desktop PCS that cannot be sold in California, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Hawai‘i, and Vermont, due to “power consumptio­n regulation­s adopted by those states. Any orders placed that are bound for those states will be cancelled.”


While we’re surprised Alienware had to take this step, the reasons why are actually not new. I had looked into this way back in 2018, after two PC companies told me the end was nigh in California due to the regulation­s that had been passed in 2016. I waded through hundreds of pages of California Energy Commission reports and meeting minutes. On the face, it did sound like California’s strict power regulation­s would end most desktop PC sales in California on July 1, 2019.

The truth is, of course, far more nuanced. Power regulators were mostly looking for ways to rein in the power use of PCS in idle mode, as a way to manage energy use during the workday.

Regulators were primarily targeting the typical compact PC or all-in-one you see sitting in banks, hospitals and businesses—not gaming PCS. In standard bureaucrat­ic style, though, it’s neither easy nor clear-cut to know which PCS are being targeted, unless you can make sense of Intel’s Expandabil­ity Score Calculatio­n chart (see below) better than we can.

The energy guidelines look at the memory bandwidth of the GPU, the efficiency of the power supply, and even the number of USB ports and other seemingly random PC parts, to calculate a score so complicate­d you have to use a spreadshee­t to figure it out.

Counterint­uitively (or perhaps this is regulators giving an out to component makers), the more powerful a PC it is, the more loopholes it is given by the power regulation­s, which is a good thing for PC enthusiast­s. Two very large component vendors told me they

thought California power regulators had listened to concerned companies and crafted reasonable restraints into the rules. Considerin­g what some environmen­tal groups pushed for at the time (we can nicely call them the “Zero-watt Coalition”), the regulation­s mostly dictate the rules for idle power consumptio­n, not active use.

It would be easy to jump to a conclusion and assume that Alienware was just the first company to stop shipping gaming PCS to those states, with others to follow. But these six states haven’t necessaril­y banned

“gaming PCS.” Alienware apparently met the standard on some models, but several don’t make the cut. The company will simply cancel orders to those customers who try to buy them.

Asked for additional informatio­n, Alienware officials told us: “Alienware has always been known for pushing the limits when it comes to innovation, performanc­e, design and premium quality. We respect the laws of all cities, states and countries where we do business and always strive to balance power and performanc­e with energy efficiency. While our most powerful gaming systems are available in all 50 states, it is accurate that select configurat­ions of the Alienware Aurora R10 and R12 aren’t shipping to certain states due to the recent California Energy Commission (CEC) Tier 2 regulation­s that went into effect on July 1, 2021. New models and configurat­ions will meet or exceed these regulation­s, in line with our long-term focus to address energy and emissions.“

What’s not clear to me is why Alienware didn’t have these particular systems ready to meet the stricter guidelines by July 1, but I frankly can’t blame Alienware either. California’s attempt to regulate computer power consumptio­n is pretty much everything we’ve come to expect from years of experience with government restrictio­ns ( go. pcworld.com/gvtr).


The good news is on July 1, 2019, sales of PCS didn’t stop in those states. And on July 1, 2021, when the second tier kicked in, most gaming PCS weren’t banned—just a few Alienware models.

But that doesn’t mean it won’t happen. Politics dictate that pressure will continue to be put on the PC industry to make more powereffic­ient machines.

In an ideal world, the industry would solve the challenge without convoluted regulation, because power efficiency is one of the easiest ways to give you more performanc­e today. That is not how the political world works, though. As long as there are groups asking for stricter regulation­s, there will be politician­s who pay attention to them. Desktop gaming PCS weren’t banned, but clearly this segment has a target on its back.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Here’s Intel’s Expandabil­ity Score Calculatio­n page, which it uses to advise motherboar­d makers on how to meet California power regulation­s. Yeah, we can’t really figure it out either.
Here’s Intel’s Expandabil­ity Score Calculatio­n page, which it uses to advise motherboar­d makers on how to meet California power regulation­s. Yeah, we can’t really figure it out either.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States