Obama challenges critics of Iran nuclear deal
WASHINGTON — Vigorously challenging his critics, President Barack Obama launched an aggressive and detailed defense of a landmark Iranian nuclear accord Wednesday, rejecting the idea that it leaves Tehran on the brink of a bomb and arguing that the only alternative to the diplomatic deal is war.
“Either the issue of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon is resolved diplomatically through a negotiation, or it’s resolved through force, through war,” Mr. Obama said during a lengthy White House news conference. “Those are the options.”
The president spoke one day after Iran, the United States and five other world powers finalized a historic, yearslong agreement to curb Tehran’s nuclear program in
exchange for billions of dollars in relief from crippling economic sanctions. Opposition to the deal has been fierce, both in Washington and Israel. Sunni Arab rivals of Shiite Iran also expressed concerns.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, perhaps the fiercest critic of Mr. Obama’s overtures to Iran, showed no sign that he could be persuaded even to tolerate the agreement. In remarks to Israel’s parliament, he said he was not bound by the terms of the deal and could still take military action against Iran. “We will reserve our right to defend ourselves against all of our enemies,” said Mr. Netanyahu, who sees Iran’s suspected pursuit of a nuclear weapon as a threat to Israel’s existence.
In Congress, resistance comes not only from Republicans, but also from within Mr. Obama’s own Democratic Party. Vice President Joe Biden spent the morning on Capitol Hill meeting privately with House Democrats and planned to return today to make a similar pitch to Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
The president said he welcomed a “robust” debate with Congress, but showed little patience for what he cast as politically motivated opposition. Lawmakers can’t block the nuclear deal, but they can try to undermine it by insisting that U.S. sanctions stay in place.
In Tehran, Iranians took to the streets to celebrate the accord, and even Iran’s hard-liners offered only mild criticism — a far cry from the outspoken opposition that the White House had feared.
The nuclear accord has become a centerpiece of Mr. Obama’s foreign policy, a high-stakes gamble that diplomatic engagement with a longtime American foe could resolve one of the world’s most pressing security challenges.
An hour into the news conference, Mr. Obama asked whether reporters had other questions about Iran — an unusual inquiry from a president rarely so freewheeling in his exchanges with the press. He pulled a piece of paper out of his pocket, saying he had “made notes” about the main criticisms of the deal and wanted to ensure that each had been addressed.
The accord requires Iran to dismantle key elements of its nuclear program, lower its uranium enrichment levels and give up thousands of centrifuges. International inspectors will have access to Iran’s declared nuclear facilities, but must request visits to Iran’s military sites, access that isn’t guaranteed.
The deal does nothing to address Iran’s broader support for terrorism in the Middle East or its detention of several American citizens, though some U.S. officials hold out hope that it could eventually lead Tehran to reassess its role in the world.
As for whether the agreement might change Iran’s other behavior, Mr. Obama said, “We’re not betting on it.”