Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Reaction mixed on Scouts’ gay policy

- By Luke Nozicka

The Boy Scouts’ decision to end its ban on gay Scout leaders was characteri­zed by one local advocate as a “monumental step back” because it still allows for discrimina­tion, but others said they were heartened by the push for equality.

Nearly 80 percent of the 57 National Executive Board members who cast ballots Monday voted to approve the new policy, allowing gay men to become troop leaders. But church-run units are still able to turn down gays applying for leadership roles if it violates their beliefs, a provision that DaShanne Stokes, an Eagle Scout, author and civil rights activist who lives in Pittsburgh, says won’t change much in the long haul.

Mr. Stokes called the new policy “a monumental step back” in his July 20 op-ed on LGBT-interest magazine Advocate.com, saying chartering organizati­ons can still discrimina­te against LGBT adults.

More than 70 percent of all Boy Scout units are chartered to faithbased organizati­ons.

But the Rev. Janet Edwards at the Community House Presbyteri­an Church on Pittsburgh’s North Side, a longtime advocate for LGBT acceptance in the church, said the vote is “acknowledg­ing what is already happening” because members of the LGBT community serve the Boy Scouts every day. She said the decision is another step on the road toward “full inclusive recognitio­n.”

“It really grieves me that any faithful person would bring an

objection to someone wanting to give their service to the Boy Scouts for any reason, and for this particular reason,” said the pastor, who joined the Taskforce on Ministry with Sexual Minorities of Pittsburgh Presbytery in 2000. “I hope that congregati­ons that have any qualms about it will rethink and continue to participat­e in Boy Scouting and its mission.”

LGBT advocate Carri Finkbeiner, a mother of two Boy Scouts and a Brownie who lives in Sheridan, said while she was “absolutely thrilled” by the policy change this week, there needs to be training to “bridge the gap” between people who are against the policy and those who are paving the way for changes.

She created a petition three years ago asking the Laurel Highlands Council “to reject the Boy Scouts of America's anti-gay policy,” and it had nearly 1,000 supporters.

Mr. Stokes, 37, who has taught about human rights and social justice at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is working toward his doctorate in sociology, said the 105-year-old organizati­on — which has suffered from a declining number of members — may have decided on the change to make it appear more inclusive.

Mike Crane, of the Scouts for Equality Pittsburgh chapter, said that while the organizati­on is moving in the right direction, the new membership policy allows religious groups to continue to discrimina­te, which “has no place in Scouting.”

“This new policy offers a compromise to religious chartering organizati­ons who still wish to deny membership to qualified adults simply because of their sexual orientatio­n,” said Mr. Crane, 30, of Monroevill­e.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — which sponsors 37,933 units, more than any other organizati­on — issued a statement after the vote saying it was “deeply troubled” by the decision.

During the last couple of years, the Boy Scouts has pushed to make the organizati­on more LGBT friendly. In 2013, its executive board voted to permit participat­ion by gay youth but not adults, and the vote on Monday comes after Boy Scouts president Robert Gates said in May that the long-standing ban was no longer sustainabl­e.

But the public’s view on the Boy Scouts has changed for the worse, according to Rasmussen Reports, an independen­t polling firm. During its April 2014 national telephone survey of 1,000 people, Rasmussen Reports found that 59 percent of American adults say they have a “somewhat favorable opinion” of the Boy Scouts of America, which is down from 73 percent in February 2012.

Regardless, some say the vote itself is worth celebratin­g. Zach Wahls, executive director of Scouts for Equality, said, “Tens of thousands of people came together because they wanted to build a better future for the Boy Scouts of America, and that future starts today.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States