Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Scientists: Postpone or relocate Olympics from Rio

Zika virus concerns prompt letter to WHO

- By Lena H. Sun

More than 100 prominent physicians, bioethicis­ts and scientists from around the world posted a letter Friday urging WHO Director-General Margaret Chan to exert pressure on Olympic authoritie­s to move the Olympics from Rio de Janeiro or delay the games because of public health concerns over the Zika virus.

Brazil, which is hosting the Olympics and the Paralympic­s, is at the epicenter of the rapidly evolving mosquito-borne epidemic.

The letter is signed by 150 individual­s from more than a dozen countries, including Brazil, Japan, Israel, Russia, Sweden, South Africa and the United States. It calls on the WHO to convene an independen­t group to advise it and the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee, and for authoritie­s to reconsider the decision to hold the Games in Rio.

“We are doing it to ask for an open, transparen­t discussion of the risks of holding the Olympics as planned in Brazil,” said Arthur Caplan, a bioethicis­t at New York University and one of the letter’s four authors, in an email explaining the reasoning behind the letter.

The group of scientists is not seeking “general assurance” from the WHO, Mr. Caplan said. Instead, they want “a frank discussion

among independen­t experts,” he said.

“If Rio is going to happen, the world deserves a full discussion of why and at what potential risks and liabilitie­s,” Mr. Caplan said.

The other authors are Lee Igel, an associate professor at New York University; Amir Attaran, a biologist and law professor at the University of Ottawa; and Christophe­r Gaffney, a senior research fellow at the University of Zurich who studies the impact of major sporting events on urban population­s.

Each author has published articles in recent weeks and months calling for the Games to be postponed because of Zika.

The letter was also signed by Ronald L. Krall of the Center for Bioethics and Health Law at the University of Pittsburgh; Alex John London, director of the Center for Ethics and Policy at Carnegie Mellon University; and Henk ten Have, director of the Center for Healthcare Ethics at Duquesne University.

In the open letter posted Friday on Twitter and Facebook, the authors said evidence shows that Brazil’s Zika strain has more serious medical consequenc­es than researcher­s previously knew, that Rio de Janeiro is one of the hardest hit areas of the epidemic, and that Rio’s mosquitoki­lling efforts are not meeting expectatio­ns.

Zika infections during pregnancy can cause serious fetal brain abnormalit­ies, including microcepha­ly, which is characteri­zed by abnormally small heads and severe developmen­tal problems. The virus has also been linked to neurologic­al disorders in adults. Zika is primarily transmitte­d through mosquitoes but can also spread through sexual contact.

The authors say that Rio’s public health system is so “severely weakened” as to make a last-minute push against the mosquito that transmits Zika impossible. Citing government data, the letter notes the increasing number of cases of dengue, a related virus spread by the same mosquitoes, that is considered a proxy for Zika.

In the specific neighborho­od of the Olympic Park, Barra da Tijuca, there have been more dengue cases in the first quarter of 2016 than in all of 2015, the letter said.

The IOC insists that the Games will go forward as planned. This month, the WHO urged athletes and travelers planning to attend the competitio­ns to take measures to protect against infection, but it did not call for the Olympics, which start Aug. 5, or the Paralympic­s, which begin Sept. 7, to be canceled or postponed.

U.S. Olympic Committee officials have said the decision to attend the Games is up to individual athletes.

The authors say the estimated 500,000 foreign tourists from all over the world who are expected to attend the Games represent an unnecessar­y risk because they could potentiall­y get infected and return home to places where the virus can become endemic.

U.S. health officials disagree with that assessment.

In an interview this week, Tom Frieden, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said: “We don’t see from a public health standpoint any reason to cancel the Olympics.”

“There’s been some claims that if the Olympics happen, it’s going to disseminat­e the virus everywhere, it’s going to amplify it,” Mr. Frieden said. “Well, we looked at the numbers. The Olympics account for less than one quarter of 1 percent of all travel to Zikaaffect­ed areas.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States