Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Lamar changes sign on Mt. Washington

City official: ‘... it’s still vinyl and it’s still illegal’

- By Anya Litvak

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

By swapping one controvers­ial black and yellow banner for another, Lamar Advertisin­g continued its feud with the City of Pittsburgh on Saturday.

Even for those lucky enough to have Mount Washington as their daily vista, it was difficult to spot the difference. And for those not following the year-long saga of the rustedout former Bayer Co. sign that was draped with a vinyl banner for Sprint last May, launching a lawsuit and public relations war, it might be hardto appreciate its significan­ce.

The Sprint sign that read “Pittsburgh WINS Black & Yellow” was replaced Saturday morning with another that reads “Connecting the City of Champions.”

“It’s awful, it’s still vinyl and it’s still illegal,” said Kevin Acklin, chief of staff for Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, without laying eyes on the new banner.

The acrimony dates back to some “good faith” discussion­s that Mr. Acklin said the city was having with Lamar in spring 2016 about what should take the place of the old advertisin­g billboard. Back then, Lamar said it was hoping the city would approve an LED sign it had worked on. But the city didn’t like that idea, and talks fell apart when Lamar put up the Sprint sign on May 31, 2016, Mr. Acklin said, “which we think is tacky and illegal.”

Since then, Pittsburgh’s Zoning Board of Adjustment ruled that Lamar didn’t have the right under its permit to replace the “nonconform­ing” 4,500-square-foot electronic sign with a 7,200-square-foot banner because “nonconform­ing signs” can’t be “enlarged, added to or replaced by another nonconform­ing sign or by a nonconform­ing use or structure.”

Despite the zoning board decision in February, Lamar refused to

take down the sign and the city took the company to court. Lamar also is suing to appeal the zoning board ruling, which it has said was “for the express purpose of silencing Lamar’s commercial speech in violation of its constituti­onal rights.”

In April, a district judge ruled that Lamar didn’t enlarge the sign by covering it with a banner. Litigation is still pending. Mr. Acklin said that with the zoning board’s decision, Lamar didn’t have the right to change the permitted use of the sign means that the advertisin­g company has forfeited its rights to it all together. He’s urging a community discussion about what should happen to that contentiou­s piece of advertisin­g real estate.

“Pittsburgh is a city that values its hillsides and its vistas,” Mr. Acklin said. “Some folks are in favor of a Hollywood-esque Pittsburgh sign. Some want a green wall. Some are in favor of just demolishin­g the sign and letting mother nature take back the hillside.”

Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412263-1455.

 ?? Pam Panchak/Post-Gazette ?? Workers lift a portion of the Lamar Advertisin­g sign in place Saturday on Mt. Washington.
Pam Panchak/Post-Gazette Workers lift a portion of the Lamar Advertisin­g sign in place Saturday on Mt. Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States