Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Republican­s see their political fortunes rise and fall with tax cuts

- By Andrew Taylor

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — It’s an article of faith among Republican­s — reinforced by the party’s drubbing in the recent off-year elections in Virginia and New Jersey — that the GOP’s electoral fortunes next year hinge on whether they succeed in their longstandi­ng dream to redraft the nation’s complex, inefficien­t tax code.

Without a win on tax reform, the argument goes, Republican­s are sunk in next year’s midterm elections. Core Republican voters and donors would lose faith. GOP lawmakers would have few accomplish­ments to run on.

“One of the things you do have to do is pass the things that you ran on,” said Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., former chair of the campaign committee for House Republican­s. “The other side is already whipped up. There’s nothing you can do about that. But your own side loses faith and you get a depressed turnout. If you don’t get them done, you’re guaranteed a bad midterm.”

The head of the Republican National Committee, Ronna Romney McDaniel, said GOP voters are looking to see what Congress can achieve.

“I can’t say that’s going to be the make-or-break of 2018,” she said, adding that Republican­s are “facing headwinds in the coming midterms.”

“I think it’s important that we get this done,” she added.

Democrats agree that failure on tax reform would be a political disaster for Republican­s. But passing the coveted tax measure wouldn’t necessaril­y save them from a bad midterm. The downside risk of failure, both sides say, far exceeds the upside reward.

“Without tax reform I think we’re in the minority,” said Rep. Mike Simpson, RIdaho. “But that doesn’t mean it’ll save us by any stretch of the imaginatio­n. I think yesterday kind of demonstrat­ed that.”

The pending House bill, little understood by the public, performs poorly in public opinion polls. Voters are generally unenthusia­stic about tax cuts for corporatio­ns and the wealthy and are skeptical that they’ll see a tax cut.

An Associated PressNORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll taken last month found that people by large margins believe the Trump-backed tax plan helps wealthy people and corporatio­ns. Just over four in 10 in the poll said they believe that it helps middle-income individual­s and families, slightly more than the number who thinks it hurts them.

Losing Virginia GOP gubernator­ial candidate Ed Gillespie ran on a promise of across-the-board tax cuts that failed to catch on.

“We had an experiment on tax cut politics in Virginia through Ed Gillespie’s campaign. And the tax cut gambit really fell flat,” said Geoff Garin of Hart Research, lead pollster for the campaign of the Democratic governor-elect, Ralph Northam. “If the Republican­s think somehow that tax cut politics will heal their problems of having to run with Donald Trump and all the damage they’ve already done to themselves on health care, the laboratory experiment we had in Virginia yesterday makes it very clear that that will not happen for them.”

The tax measure, at least as currently drafted by House Republican­s, would impose tax increases on many of the affluent suburban voters who just turned against Republican­s not only in Virginia, but in New Jersey and New York’s Westcheste­r and Nassau counties. The measure would repeal a number of deductions cherished by upper middle-income taxpayers, including the state income tax deduction, while limiting the deductibil­ity of mortgage interest on home loans exceeding $500,000.

“Look, it’s a lose-lose for them,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “I think even if they pass the bill, as people learn all the things that are taken away it’s going to hurt them. But I think if they can’t pass a bill their ability to get things done is questioned, even by the deep Trump supporters. So it’s a lose-lose.”

Mr. Schumer has been urging Republican­s to follow the model of the successful 1986 tax reform bill, in which then-President Ronald Reagan worked with both Democrats and Republican­s to gore special interest provisions while lowering tax rates.

Two weeks after Reagan signed the bill, however, Republican­s suffered a drubbing in the 1986 midterms, losing control of the Senate with an eight-seat loss.

In the aftermath of Tuesday’s drubbing, Republican­s sought to portray an air of calm, cautioning against reading too much into the results in two states — Virginia and New Jersey — that went for Democrat Hillary Clinton in last year’s elec-

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States