Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

U.K. expels 23 Russian diplomats

Britain accuses Russia of nerve agent attack

-

LONDON — Relations between Britain and Russia plunged Wednesday to a chilly level not seen since the Cold War as Prime Minister Theresa May expelled 23 diplomats, severed high-level contacts and vowed both open and covert action against Kremlin meddling after the poisoning of a former spy.

Russia said it would respond soon to what it called Britain’s “crude” and “hostile” actions that are helping to create a “hysterical atmosphere.”

After what Ms. May described as the biggest expulsion of Russian diplomats in more than 30 years, it was not clear how strongly allies would rally to her side. Indeed, at the White House, President Donald Trump’s initial response to the poisoning had been more circumspec­t, with his spokeswoma­n pointedly avoiding naming Russia as the likely perpetrato­r of the attack.

But tougher rhetoric came Wednesday evening, when White House spokeswoma­n Sarah Huckabee Sanders put out a statement saying the U.S. “stands in solidarity with its closest ally” and shares Britain’s assessment that “Russia is responsibl­e for the reckless nerve agent attack.”

At the same time, some of the strongest language in support of

Britain came at an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday from the American ambassador, Nikki Haley, who has been tougher on Russia than Mr. Trump. She said that Russia must cooperate with the British investigat­ion and “account for its actions.”

While Ms. May pledged to disrupt Russian espionage and “hostile state activity,” she gave few details about how hard Britain would hit Russian politician­s and oligarchs where it really hurts — in their wallets.

“Expelling diplomats is a kind of a standard response,” said Natasha Kuhrt, a Russia expert at King’s College London. “I’m not sure it’s going to make Moscow stand up andthink.”

Ms. May told the House of Commons that 23 Russians diplomats who have been identified as undeclared intelligen­ce officers have a week to leave Britain.

“This will be the single biggest expulsion for over 30 years,” Ms. May said, adding that it would “fundamenta­lly degrade Russian intelligen­ce capability in the U.K. for years to come.”

Ms. May spoke after Moscow ignored a midnight deadline to explain how the nerve agent Novichok, developed by the Soviet Union, was used against Sergei Skripal, an ex-Russian agent convicted of spying for Britain, and his daughter Yulia. They remain in critical condition in a hospital in Salisbury, southweste­rn England, after being found unconsciou­s March 4.

Ms. May said “there is no alternativ­e conclusion other than that the Russian state was culpable for the attempted murder of Mr. Skripal and his daughter.”

She announced a range of economic and diplomatic measures, including the suspension of high-level contacts with Russia. An invitation for Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to visit Britain has been canceled, and British ministers and royals won’t attend the soccer World Cup in Russia this summer.

Ms. May also said Britain would clamp down on murky Russian money and strengthen its powers to impose sanctions on abusers of human rights, though she gave few details.

“We will freeze Russian state assets wherever we have the evidence that they may be used to threaten the life or property of U.K. nationals or residents,” Ms. May said, promising to use all legal powers against criminals and corrupt elites, and to “increase checks on private flights, customs and freight.”

“There is no place for these people — or their money — in our country,” she said.

Ms. May said some of the measures that will be taken against the Putin government “cannot be shared publicly for reasons of national security.”

The Russian Embassy in London said the expulsion of diplomats was “totally unacceptab­le, unjustifie­d and shortsight­ed.” Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko said Britain’s actions were “a provocatio­n.”

Russia did not immediatel­y announce retaliator­y measures, but its Foreign Ministry said “our response will not be long in coming.”

It said Britain’s “hostile measures” were “an unpreceden­tedly crude provocatio­n.”

Britain called an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council in New York at which U.K. and Russian diplomats traded accusation­s, with Britain blaming the Russian state for the attack and Russia vehemently denying responsibi­lity.

Some Russia experts said the measures announced by Ms. May were unlikely to make Russian President Vladimir Putin’s government change its behavior. She didn’t expel Russia’s ambassador or announce sanctions against any individual­s or companies. More wide-ranging responses — such as financial sanctions or preventing Russian banks from using the SWIFT internatio­nal payments messaging system — require multilater­al support and time.

Critics of the British government have long claimed that the U.K. is reluctant to act against Russia because London’s property market and financial sector are magnets for billions in Russian money.

“There does not seem to be any real appetite so far to investigat­e the ill-gotten gains of the Russian elite that have been laundered through London,” said John Lough, an associate fellow in the Eurasia program at the Chatham House think-tank. “It is not clear to me that London’s response will hit the Kremlin where it hurts.”

Moscow has denied responsibi­lity for Mr. Skripal’s poisoning. It refused to comply with Britain’s demand for an explanatio­n, saying the U.K. must first provide samples of the poison collected by investigat­ors.

Some in Russia have suggested that the nerve agent could have come from another former Soviet country.

Lawmaker Vladimir Gutenev, a member of Russia’s state commission for chemical disarmamen­t, said Russia had scrapped its stockpile of Novichok.

“It is hard to say what may be happening in neighborin­g countries,” he was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.

Britain is seeking support from allies in the European Union and NATO in response to the use of an illegal chemical weapon on British soil. Ms. May’s office said Mr. Trump — who has been notably reluctant to criticize Mr. Putin — told the prime minister the U.S. was “with the U.K. all the way.”

Ms. Haley on Wednesday called the assassinat­ion attempt part of “an alarming increase” in the use of chemical weapons — and says Russia is “a growing concern in all of this dangerous and destabiliz­ing activity.”

She said the U.S. will stop complainin­g about Russia “if the Russian government stopped using chemical weapons to assassinat­e its enemies, and if the Russian government stopped helping its Syrian allies to use chemical weapons to kill Syrian children.”

At the same time, Ms. Sanders said the poisoning of Mr. Skripal fit into a pattern of Russia disregardi­ng internatio­nal law, underminin­g the sovereignt­y of other countries, and trying to “subvert and discredit Western democratic institutio­ns and processes.”

The New York Times, Bloomberg News, The Washington Post and Deutsche Presse-Agentur contribute­d.

 ?? Mary Altaffer/Associated Press ?? Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia speaks during a Security Council meeting Wednesday on the situation between Britain and Russia at United Nations headquarte­rs.
Mary Altaffer/Associated Press Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia speaks during a Security Council meeting Wednesday on the situation between Britain and Russia at United Nations headquarte­rs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States