Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Emotions run hot over court nominee

Choice of Kavanaugh puts senators at odds

- Washington Bureau chief Tracie Mauriello contribute­d.

WASHINGTON— Conservati­ve Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh plunged into his confirmati­on battle Tuesday, meeting face-to-face with Senate leaders in what promises to be an intense debate over abortion rights, presidenti­al power and other legal disputes that could reshape the court and roil this fall’s elections.

Judge Kavanaugh is a favorite of the GOP legal establishm­ent, and his arrival as President Donald Trump’s nominee was greeted on Capitol Hill with praise from Republican­s and skepticism from Democrats. There were also pledges of open minds by key senators whose votes will most likely determine the outcome.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called Judge Kavanaugh “one of the most thoughtful jurists” in the country but warned of an onslaught of “fear mongering” from liberal groups trying to derail the nomination. He said it was clear that many Democrats “didn’t care who the nominee was at all. Whoever President Trump put up, they were opposed to.”

Indeed, Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., threatened to oppose Monday night’s U.S. Supreme Court nomination no matter whom the president named. The nominee turned out to be Judge Kavanaugh, whom Pennsylvan­ia congressma­n and U.S. Senate candidate Lou Barletta described as smart jurist who respects the rule of law.

Mr. Barletta, R-Luzerne, blasted his political rival Tuesday during a news conference in Harrisburg, characteri­zing the Democrat as an obstructio­nist who will do anything to block Mr. Trump’s agenda.

Mr. Casey hasn’t weighed in on Judge Kavanaugh’s competence. It was enough for him to know that his name came from a list drawn up by the right-leaning Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society.

Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer, the Senate’s Democratic leader, said his party’s lawmakers did indeed care who the nominee was — and what his views were on such thorny issues as abortion and Mr. Trump himself.

Mr. Trump “did exactly what he said he would do on the campaign trail — nominate so meone who will overturn women’s reproducti­ve rights,” the New York senator said.

He also argued that the president chose the man he thought would best protect him from the investigat­ion by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election. Judge Kavanaugh has written about a need to free the executive branch from intrusive criminal investigat­ions.

“Not only did Mr. Kavanaugh say that a president should not be subpoenaed, he said a president shouldn’t be investigat­ed,” Mr. Schumer said.

The confirmati­on marathon is expected to drag on for months, and no date has yet been set for hearings. GOP leaders, with a slim majority in the Senate, are anxious to have Judge Kavanaugh in place for the start of thecourt’s session in October — and before the November congressio­nal elections.

But that may be a tall order. His confirmati­on is complicate­d by an unusually long record as an appellate judge and as a George W. Bush administra­tion official — and also his role as part of the Kenneth Starr investigat­ion of President Bill Clinton.

Judge Kavanaugh, just 53, could serve on the high court for decades.

As he arrived on Capitol Hill Tuesday, he huddled with Mr. McConnell, Vice President Mike Pence and former Sen. Jon Kyl. He also met with Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which will determine whether to recommend him to the full Senate.

Mr. McConnell, who has been influentia­l in shaping Mr. Trump’s remaking of the judiciary, said, “What we’d like to see is a few open minds about this extraordin­ary talent.”

Mr. Grassley said a speedy confirmati­on wasn’t necessaril­y the goal. The vetting process, he said, is “going to be thorough and going to be done right.” Mr. Pence told reporters that Judge Kavanaugh was a “good man.”

Republican­s have little margin of error for the final vote unless a few Democrats can be brought onboard. Mr. McConnell has a 51-49 Senate majority, narrowed further by the absence of ailing Sen. John McCain of Arizona. But they hope to gain support from a handful of Democrats who are up for re-election in states where Mr. Trump is popular.

So far, Democrats are uniting behind a strategy to turn the confirmati­on fight into a referendum on conservati­ves’ efforts to undo abortion access, chip away at health care protection­s under the Affordable Care Act and protect Mr. Trump from Mr. Mueller.

Senators will be seeking access to Judge Kavanaugh’s writings and correspond­ence, reams of documents that will take weeks to compile and even longer to review, giving opponents ample opportunit­y to wage a political battle. Protesters have filled the steps of the Supreme Court in recent days.

By fall, the nomination may turn on a handful of senators who will be under enormous pressure ahead of the midterm elections.

The Democrats are trying to pressure two Republican­s, Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, to oppose any nominee who threatens the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. The two have supported access to abortion services, and activists have already begun sending wire coat hangers, as a symbol of an era when abortion was illegal, to Ms. Collins’ office.

She said that with Judge Kavanaugh’s credential­s, “it’s very difficult for anyone to tell me that he’s not qualified for the job.” But she added that other issues also would come into play for her, including “judicial temperamen­t” and “judicial philosophy.”

Ms. Murkowski said, “We’ve got some due diligence that we’ve got to do.”

At the same time, Republican­s are urging a half dozen Democratic senators, largely those who are up for re-election in Trump-won states, to back the president’s choice.

Among their targets are Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, as well as Doug Jones of Alabama, who is not up for reelection but represents a conservati­ve state in the Deep South.

Judge Kavanaugh in the past has made statements about respecting precedent that could help in winning over senators, particular­ly Ms. Murkowski and Ms. Collins.

In his 2006 confirmati­on hearing to become a federal judge, he said, “I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because it’s “binding precedent” that has been “reaffirmed many times.”

Yet there’s little doubt that Judge Kavanaugh, a solidly conservati­ve, politicall­y connected judge, would shift the nation’s highest court further to the right.

A product of the GOP legal establishm­ent in Washington, Judge Kavanaugh is a former law clerk for retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy. Like Mr. Trump’s first nominee last year, Justice Neil Gorsuch, he would be a young addition who could help remake the court for decades with rulings that could restrict abortion, expand gun rights and roll back key parts of Obamacare.

Mr. Trump unveiled his pick showbiz style, in a suspense-filled prime-time televised announceme­nt Monday evening. He called Judge Kavanaugh “one of the finest and sharpest legal minds of our time.”

 ?? Chip Somodevill­a/Getty Images ?? Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, second from right, talks to the news media with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, right, Tuesday at the U.S. Capitol.
Chip Somodevill­a/Getty Images Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, second from right, talks to the news media with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, right, Tuesday at the U.S. Capitol.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States