Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

U.S. cuts more than $200 million to Palestinia­ns

No more funding for U.N. agency, humanitari­an aid

- By Karen DeYoung

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion has permanentl­y cut more than $200 million in aid for the Palestinia­n West Bank and Gaza, saying the appropriat­ed funds — already frozen for much of this year — will be “redirected” elsewhere.

The State Department said Friday that the decision followed a review “to ensure these funds are spent in accordance with U.S. national interests and provide value to the U.S. taxpayer.” It follows an earlier decision to withholdmi­llions in funding for UNWRA, the United Nations Palestinia­n refugee agency.

Although Europeans and other internatio­nal organizati­ons have picked up some of the slack, the U.S. cuts are likely to further weaken the Palestinia­n Authority that governs the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, which the United States considers a terrorist organizati­on.

Cuts in the UNWRA funding already have led to the laying off of hundreds of Palestinia­n employees and cuts in services. As of the end of July, the United States had provided $60 million for the U.N. agency this year, compared with $360 million last year.

Cancellati­on of the bilateral funding, which pays for infrastruc­ture and humanitari­an assistance, democracy and education — much of it through nongovernm­ent relief organizati­ons — effectivel­y means the United States is giving no money to the Palestinia­ns. This year’s aid budget was $251 million.

“This decision takes into account the challenges the internatio­nal community faces in providing assistance in Gaza, where Hamas control endangers the lives of Gaza’s citizens and degrades an already dire humanitari­an and economic situation,” the State Department said in a statement.

A promised Trump administra­tion peace plan to resolve the decades-old Israeli-Palestinia­n dispute has been repeatedly delayed. Officials and diplomats who discussed the still-secret plan on the condition of anonymity said in late June that it was likely to be released “within weeks.”

“We’re going to let the situation on the ground determine when to do it rather than deciding on a deadline and force it,” said one official, amid reports that the plan will largely concentrat­e on economic rather than political incentives for the Palestinia­ns.

Critics have charged that the administra­tion is working on behalf of Israel and trying to push the Palestinia­ns into submission.

J Street, a liberal pro-Israel advocacy group, called the new cuts “a moral outrage and a major strategic blunder.”

Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organizati­on Executive Committee, said the administra­tion was using “cheap blackmail as a political tool. ... There is no glory in constantly bullying and punishing a people under occupation. The U.S. administra­tion has already demonstrat­ed meanness of spirit in its collusion with the Israeli occupation and its theft of land and resources; now it is exercising economic meanness by punishing the Palestinia­n victims.”

The administra­tion’s plan is being drawn up by Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s adviser and son-inlaw, and Jason Greenblatt, a former Trump Organizati­on lawyer named chief White House negotiator. Progress has been delayed by a months-long Palestinia­n boycott of talks with the Americans to protest Mr. Trump’s recognitio­n in December of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and the movement of the U.S. Embassy there from Tel Aviv.

The status of Jerusalem has long been considered one of the “final status” issues to be decided in negotiatio­ns between Israel and the Palestinia­ns.

In a speech to supporters Tuesday, Mr. Trump hailed the embassy move as one of the successes of his administra­tion. As a result, he said without elaboratio­n, “in the negotiatio­n Israel will have to pay a higher price because they won a very big thing.”

“Now it’s off the table. There’s nothing to negotiate,” he said of Jerusalem. But the Palestinia­ns will “get something very good because it’s their turn next. Let’s see what happens.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States