Vatican report says W.Va. bishop sent cash to priests
WASHINGTON — In the years before he was ousted for alleged sexual harassment and financial abuses, the leader of the Catholic Church in West Virginia gave cash gifts totaling $350,000 to fellow clergymen, including young priests he is accused of mistreating, and more than a dozen cardinals in the United States and at the Vatican, according to church records obtained by The Washington Post.
Bishop Michael Bransfield wrote the checks from his personal account over more than a decade, and the West Virginia
diocese reimbursed him by boosting his compensation to cover the value of the gifts, the records show. As a tax-exempt nonprofit, the diocese must use its money only for charitable purposes.
The gifts — one as large as $15,000 — were detailed in a draft of a confidential report to the Vatican about Bishop Bransfield’s alleged misconduct. The names of 11 powerful clerics who received checks were edited out of the final report at the request of the archbishop overseeing the investigation, William Lori of Baltimore.
Archbishop Lori’s name was among those cut. He received a total of $10,500, records show.
Archbishop Lori wanted the names removed because he feared they would be “a distraction” from the report’s other findings, according to a person familiar with the investigation who was not authorized to discuss the findings.
The Post obtained both versions of the report, along with numerous emails and financial records.
The Vatican began the investigation last fall after clerics in West Virginia raised concerns about Bishop Bransfield’s behavior. Five lay investigators concluded that the cash gifts were part of a broader pattern of abuse of power by the bishop, including harassing young priests and spending church money on personal indulgences.
“Bishop Bransfield adopted an extravagant and lavish lifestyle that was in stark contrast to the faithful he served and was for his own personal benefit,” they wrote in the final report.
During his 13 years as bishop in West Virginia, one of the poorest states in the nation, Bishop Bransfield spent $2.4 million in church money on travel, much of it personal, which included flying in chartered jets and staying in luxury hotels, according to the report.
Bishop Bransfield and several subordinates spent an average of nearly $1,000 a month on alcohol, it says. The West Virginia diocese paid $4.6 million to renovate Bishop Bransfield’s church residence after a fire damaged a single bathroom. When Bishop Bransfield was in the chancery, an administrative building, fresh flowers were delivered daily, at a cost of about $100 a day — almost $182,000 in all.
Bishop Bransfield, 75, drew on a source of revenue that many parishioners knew little about — oil-rich land in Texas donated to the diocese more than a century ago. He spoke of church money as if it were his to spend without restriction, according to the report.
“I own this,” he is quoted as saying on many occasions.
In statements after receiving questions from the Post, Archbishop Lori said that “in light of what I have come to learn of Bishop Bransfield’s handling of diocesan finances,” he is returning $7,500 to the diocese and asking that it be donated to Catholic Charities.
He also told members of the diocese in a statement that he received permission “as of today” to sell the bishop’s residence in Wheeling and use the proceeds to support victims and survivors of sexual abuse.
He acknowledged that the names of senior clerics were cut from the final report.
“Including them could inadvertently and/or unfairly suggest that in receiving gifts for anniversaries or holidays there were expectations for reciprocity,” he wrote. “No evidence was found to suggest this.”
In an interview with the Post, Bishop Bransfield disputed the allegations, saying “none of it is true,” but he declined to go into detail because attorneys had advised him not to comment.
One of his attorneys said Archbishop Lori has not responded to Bishop Bransfield’s request for a copy of the report.
“Everybody’s trying to destroy my reputation,” Bishop Bransfield said by phone without elaborating. “These people are terrible to me.”
According to the report, he spoke with investigators in February and “emphatically denied engaging in any sexual harassment or sexual activity with any priest or seminarian, either verbally or suggestively by his conduct.”
The report does not include responses from Bishop Bransfield to many of the spending allegations, but he told investigators that aides oversaw the renovations at his residence and that back problems left him unable to fly in economy class.
The documents obtained by the Post provide a rare inside look at the finances of one diocese at a time when Catholic leaders, buffeted by criticism over their handling of clergy sex abuse cases, have pledged to reform a church hierarchy that gives virtually unchecked power to bishops and cardinals.