Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Helmet dispute sidelines Brown

-

production to offset the chagrin that one would guess is being experience­d by team officials as they deal with Brown’s act, which is in fullforce.

He has been plagued by ailing feet, a situation reportedly caused or aggravated when Brown failed to wear proper footwear at a cryotherap­y treatment. He has been away from the team, reportedly seeking further medical advice. There have been several reports that Brown cut off communicat­ion with the Raiders at least temporaril­y. NFL Network reported that Brown has showed up late to team meetings and regularly has not been attentive in them when he does show up.

As if all of that wasn’t enough, Brown is at odds with the league over wanting to wear his favorite helmet even though the model has been discontinu­ed by the manufactur­er, and is more than 10 years old and therefore not certified by the national governing body. The NFL says that Brown must switch to an approved helmet to be on the field. So Brown filed a grievance, which was heard Friday by an independen­t arbitrator. No immediate ruling was made.

According to ESPN, Brown has told the Raiders that he will not play football again unless he’s allowed to wear his old helmet. He’s unlikely to get his way this time.

Barring an unexpected decision in Brown’s favor, the NFL policy will be upheld and Brown will be told to either wear a different and approved helmet or not play. Several people familiar with the testing program said they expect the NFL to prevail. The helmet model in question, the Schutt AiR Advantage, was given an “adequate” rating and was ranked 13th among 15 helmet models tested in a May 2012 evaluation by Virginia Tech.

Schutt said in a 2014 written statement by a marketing executive to a Texas television station: “For its time, the AiR Advantage was a very successful helmet for us. Its light weight made it very popular with skill position players, who want to be as fast as they can. ... We discontinu­ed making the helmet three years ago because current helmet technology had moved past it.”

Brown’s own union is on board with the league’s approach to improving helmet performanc­e in the name of player safety. The NFL Players Associatio­n conducts joint laboratory testing with the league of various helmet models, evaluating them on their performanc­e in impact tests. Under that program, helmet models that perform poorly are prohibited. The 32 NFL players who wore prohibited models last season were told that they no longer would be permitted to wear them this season.

Players aren’t told which helmet model to wear. They are given a variety of approved models and can choose among them. League officials regard the helmet-testing program as a significan­t component of their push to curb the number of concussion­s suffered by players. Concussion­s were down 24 percent last season, according tothe league’s injury data.

NFL safety officials have acknowledg­ed that some players are so accustomed to their old helmets that, for football performanc­e reasons, they are reluctant to switch. But they are being given no choice, in the name of furthering player safety. The NFL, remember, reached a $1 billion settlement with former players who sued overthe effects of head injuries.

Among those players being forced to switch helmets, only Brown has filed a grievance. So he’llhave a choice to make. He can show up, wear a different helmet, play football and get paid to do so. Or he can stay home and not get paid.

It will be, in all likelihood, up to him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States