Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The future of American politics

After tribal war, the politics of weaving

- David Brooks David Brooks is a columnist for The New York Times.

Men and women are primarily motivated by self-interest. No other partial truth has done as much damage as this one.

If you base your political and social systems on the idea that the autonomous self-interested individual is the basic unit of society, then you will wind up with an individual­istic culture that widens the maneuverin­g room between people but shreds the relationsh­ips and community between people.

You will wind up with a capitalism in which superstar performers get concentrat­ed in superstar cities and everybody else gets left behind. In a system based purely on competitiv­e individual self-interest, those who are advantaged get to race out further ahead year by year. The sense of common community and equal dignity is annihilate­d.

Populists on the right and the left look at this current reality and they come to a swift conclusion: The game is rigged! Liberalism is a con! Then they come to a different conclusion. The essential logic of society is not actually individual­s seeking their self-interest. It’s groups struggling for power. Society is an arena where certain groups crush other groups.

The populist narratives differ but all have the same underlying structure. We’re locked in a lifeor-death struggle of oppressor vs. oppressed groups. It’s Us versus Them — the good people here and the bad people there.

But both of these political tendencies are wrong about human nature. They create societies that pulverize who we are and are made to be.

Human beings didn’t evolve into the world’s dominant species because we are more autonomous. We thrived as a species because we are better at cooperatio­n.

We evolved complex social networks in our brains to make us better at bonding, teaching and collaborat­ing. We don’t cooperate only to get things we want individual­ly. Often, we collaborat­e to build shared environmen­ts we can enjoy together. Often, we pick a challenge just so we can have the joy of collaborat­ing. Relationsh­ips are ends to themselves.

Thus, the best future for American politics is not based on individual competitio­n or group war. It’s based on this narrative: We are an incredibly diverse society that got good at collaborat­ion because we had to. The best future politics puts collaborat­ive pluralism, weaving, at the center.

That means, first, electing leaders who are masters at cooperatio­n. Second, it means infusing cooperativ­e weaver values into all of our organizati­ons. There’s a fantastic community organizati­on in Baltimore called Thread that has a few core competenci­es that shape its culture. We’d be in

much better shape if every organizati­on in America lived out these values:

Show all the way up. Be fully present, honest and vulnerable in all interactio­ns. Recognize your own value. Push through discomfort to connect deeply with others.

Learn from all voices. Most of our challenges are complex. It takes every perspectiv­e to see an issue whole. Assume people have the best of intentions, and actively focus on the value they bring. Be intentiona­l about being with those different from you.

Treat relationsh­ips as wealth. Human bonds are the chief resource of your organizati­on. Recognize the inherent value of each person and meet each person where she or he is.

Fail forward. Life is iterative. Your vision is not always the answer, but rather a step in a creative learning process. Set up feedback mechanisms that support change and personal growth. Dogma won’t get you to the solution. Openness and adjustment will.

The third task of weaver politics is reforming institutio­ns so they encourage collaborat­ion. Some of our institutio­ns, like Congress, have been completely subsumed by tribal warfare.

Still other institutio­ns have become dehumanize­d. Our schools, hospitals, prisons and welfare systems don’t embed people in thick relationsh­ips. They treat them as units to be processed and shoved out the door. Still other institutio­ns cease to exist. Why do we still not have a national service program?

The fourth and final task of this kind of politics is transforma­tive policies that directly address our most serious divides. For example, reparation­s are a way to acknowledg­e the wrongs inflicted on African Americans and to begin to heal that breach. Congressma­n Ro Khanna has a proposal that would show rural America that everyone has a place in the new economy. He would fund research and technology hubs throughout the country — a land grant college system for the 21st century.

The politics of weaving grows out of the acknowledg­ment that there is no dominant majority in America. There is no moderate center. Your group will never pulverize and eliminate your opposing group. There’s no choice but to set up better collaborat­ive systems across difference. This is not a problem; it’s an adventure.

Yes, human beings are partly selfish and self-interested. But we are also supremely social and collaborat­ive. This is the part we have to work on now.

 ?? Getty Images/iStockphot­o ??
Getty Images/iStockphot­o
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States