Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Only one prism

- As Others See It Andrew Sullivan wrote this for New York magazine. This is an excerpt of his original column.

This is the country of extraordin­ary political and cultural freedom, but it is also the country of religious fanaticism, moral panics and crusades against vice. It’s the country of “The Scarlet Letter” and Prohibitio­n and the Hollywood blacklist and the Lavender Scare. The kind of stifling, suffocatin­g and nerve-racking atmosphere that Vaclav Havel evokes in his essay “The Power of the Powerless” is chillingly recognizab­le in American history and increasing­ly in the American present.

The new orthodoxy — what the writer Wesley Yang has described as the “successor ideology” to liberalism — seems to be rooted in what journalist Wesley Lowery calls “moral clarity.” And what is the foundation­al belief of such moral clarity? That America is systemical­ly racist and a white-supremacis­t project from the start.

It sees America as in its essence not about freedom but oppression. It argues, in fact, that all the ideals about individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government and the equality of all human beings were always a falsehood to cover for and justify and entrench the enslavemen­t of human beings under the fiction of race. It wasn’t that these values competed with the poison of slavery, and eventually overcame it, in an epic, bloody civil war whose casualties were overwhelmi­ngly white. It’s that the liberal system is itself a form of white supremacy ….

This view of the world certainly has “moral clarity.” What it lacks is moral complexity. No country can be so reduced to one single prism and damned because of it.

In this manic, Manichean world you’re not even given the space to say nothing. “White Silence =

Violence” is a slogan chanted and displayed in every one of these marches. It’s very reminiscen­t of totalitari­an states where you have to compete to broadcast your fealty to the cause. In these past two weeks, if you didn’t put up on Instagram or Facebook some kind of slogan or symbol displaying your wokeness, you were instantly suspect. The cultishnes­s of this can be seen in the way people are actually cutting off contact with their own families if they don’t awaken and see the truth and repeat its formulae.

That’s why recently there have been so many individual­s issuing public apologies as to their previous life and resolution­s to “do the work” to more actively dismantle “structures of oppression.” It’s why corporate America has rushed to adopt every plank of this ideology and display its allegiance publicly. If you do this, and do it emphatical­ly, you can display your virtue to customers and clients, and you might even be left alone. Or not.

Every single aspect of life, every word you speak or write, every tweet you might send, every private conversati­on you may have had, any email you might have sent, every friend you love is either a function of your racism or antiracism. And this is why flawed human beings are now subjected to such brutal public shamings, outings and inquisitio­ns — in order to root out the structural evil they represent.

To be woke is to wake up to the truth — the blinding truth that liberal society doesn’t exist, that everything is a form of oppression or resistance, and that there is no third option. You are either with us or you are to be cast into darkness.

We have no secret police. The state is not requiring adherence to this doctrine. And it is not a lie that this country has some deep reckoning to do on the legacy of slavery and segregatio­n. In so far as this movement has made us more aware and cognizant of the darkness of the past, it is a very good thing, and overdue.

But in so far as it has insisted we are defined entirely by that darkness, it has the crudeness of a kind of evangelist doctrine — with the similar penalties for waywardnes­s. We have co-workers eager to weaponize their ideology to purge the workforce. We have employers demanding our attendance at seminars and workshops to teach this ideology. We have journalist­s (of all people) poring through other writers’ work or records to get them in trouble, demoted or fired. And, critically, we have a Twitter mob to hound people into submission.

Liberalism is not just a set of rules. There’s a spirit to it. A spirit that believes that there are whole spheres of human life that lie beyond ideology — friendship, art, love, sex, scholarshi­p, family. A spirit that seeks not to impose orthodoxy but to open up the possibilit­ies of the human mind and soul. A spirit that seeks moral clarity but understand­s that this is very hard, life and history are complex, and it is this complexity that a truly liberal society seeks to understand if it wants to advance. It is a spirit that deals with an argument — and not a person — and that counters that argument with logic, not abuse. It’s a spirit that allows for various ideas to clash and evolve and treats citizens as equal, regardless of their race, rather than insisting on equity for designated racial groups. It’s a spirit that delights sometimes in being wrong because it offers an opportunit­y to figure out what’s right. And it’s generous, humorous and graceful in its love of argument and debate. It gives you space to think and reflect and deliberate.

Twitter, of course, is the antithesis of all this — and its mercy-free, moblike qualities when combined with a moral panic are, quite frankly, terrifying.

 ?? Demetrius Freeman/The New York Times ?? Protesters in Brooklyn demonstrat­e June 14 against police brutality and racism.
Demetrius Freeman/The New York Times Protesters in Brooklyn demonstrat­e June 14 against police brutality and racism.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States