Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A misguided strategy

-

Environmen­tal Protection Agency chief Andrew Wheeler was in the Hill District on Aug. 13 to confirm the Trump administra­tion’s decision to rescind federal regulation­s on methane emissions. This shortsight­ed rule change will not improve the environmen­t or the public health of American citizens.

Oil and gas operators, who have facilitate­d the natural gas boom that has made America the world’s largest gas producer, are the biggest industrial source of methane emissions in the U. S.

Methane is the main component of natural gas, and despite having a shorter life span than CO2, it is exponentia­lly more effective at trapping heat, making it a dangerous greenhouse gas that accelerate­s climate change and exacerbate­s air pollution.

Energy companies have been producing natural gas at record volumes — with a projected increase of 50% by 2040 — ensuring that methane will remain a major source of emissions for decades to come.

A report published in the journal Nature concluded that global emissions of methane from oil and gas production have been greatly underestim­ated, and the true numbers could be up to 40% higher than previously reported.

A study by the Environmen­tal Defense Fund found that in 2017, the most recent year for which data is available, drillers in Pennsylvan­ia emitted more than 1.1 million tons of methane into the atmosphere, 16 times the amount they reported to state officials.

Under the auspices of the Clean Air Act, the Obama administra­tion attempted to regulate methane by introducin­g rules that required producers to detect and repair methane leaks in their systems installed after 2015. Plugging these leaks was seen as a cost- effective way to address emissions. This was the low- hanging fruit in the campaign to mitigate climate change that Mr. Wheeler has put back on the tree.

Undoing efforts to strengthen industry vigilance is neither a strategy nor a vision, and it will simply transfer the costs from the fossil fuel industry to the American people in the form of degraded air and the sundry effects of more methane in the atmosphere.

Fortunatel­y, the Trump administra­tion’s indifferen­ce to climate does not affect Pennsylvan­ia’s ability to require producers to control their emissions in a reasonable and responsibl­e way.

The focus of Pennsylvan­ia’s methane reduction strategy has been on newer sources of emissions; however, this doesn’t prevent the state from also establishi­ng regulation­s on wells and machinery constructe­d before 2018, which make up the vast majority of the fossil fuel infrastruc­ture in the state.

The state Department of Environmen­tal Protection is working on rules that would control the emissions of volatile organic compounds from older sites; however, Pennsylvan­ia shale gas contains low levels of VOCs, which means that, in the words of DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell, “a large amount of methane may be emitted without triggering the VOC control thresholds.”

The state has the authority to expand the scope of methane regulation, which would include quarterly inspection­s of sites using leak detection repair technologi­es.

As the nation’s second- largest gas producing state, Pennsylvan­ia should be at the forefront of these regulation­s. We need our state officials to prioritize public health, and they can do this by better strengthen­ing methane management in the commonweal­th.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States